PDA

View Full Version : Rubber City Armory Bolt Carrier Group



UWone77
26 June 2013, 04:40
Rubber City Armory (http://www.rubbercityarmory.com/index.php) is a relative newcomer to the AR15 BCG market. They feature black nitride processing which they claim eliminates the need for lube or oil for the life of the weapon. Some may balk at the claims and price, but keep in mind, Young Manufacting Chrome BCG's (http://www.rainierarms.com/?page=shop/detail&product_id=1007)and Fail Zero BCG's (http://www.failzero.com/component/virtuemart/?Itemid=1)are similar in price. Pretty bold claims, but I also can't wait to try one out.

Rubber City Armory's Enhanced Bolt Carrier Group (http://www.rubbercityarmory.com/product.php) is "drop-in ready" for M16/AR15 weapons. The enhanced features of RCA's Bolt Carrier Group give law enforcement, military and security professionals performance, reliability and the advantage in times of need.

Manufactured to meet and exceed DoD MiL-Spec 961 standards, our Enhanced Bolt Carrier Group is designed to provide tens of thousands of rounds of reliable performance.

Blacknitride processing and polymeric adsorption increase wear properties, steel strength and increase the life of all treated components.

http://i1016.photobucket.com/albums/af282/richdkim77/RCA_zpscf458f24.jpg (http://s1016.photobucket.com/user/richdkim77/media/RCA_zpscf458f24.jpg.html)

Each Rubber City Armory Bolt Carrier Group Includes:

• Complete Bolt
◦Machined from Carpenter 158 Steel
◦Shot peened
◦Batch MPI inspected
• Retaining Pin
• Carrier with Staked Gas Key
◦Machined from 8620 Steel
• Firing Pin
• Cam Pin

http://i1016.photobucket.com/albums/af282/richdkim77/RCA2_zps90b0624f.jpg (http://s1016.photobucket.com/user/richdkim77/media/RCA2_zps90b0624f.jpg.html)

Rubber City Armory
1344 Kenmore Blvd.
Akron, Ohio 44314
info@rubbercityarmory.com
330-794-7304
http://i1016.photobucket.com/albums/af282/richdkim77/RCA3_zps81f0141e.png (http://s1016.photobucket.com/user/richdkim77/media/RCA3_zps81f0141e.png.html)

tac40
26 June 2013, 07:05
Interesting.

Deckard
26 June 2013, 13:59
Not really mil-spec if it's not HPT as I understand it.

UWone77
26 June 2013, 14:14
I may get one just to run it through the trials and with no lube. Just to see how long it will run.

Slippers
26 June 2013, 16:46
There's a fairly lengthy thread on M4C regarding these bolt carrier groups. I'll say up front I don't own one, and have no personal experience, but many people in the M4C thread have purchased them.

My biggest concern is that they haven't been consistent based on the pictures that owners have been posting over the last 6 months. Some come with coated firing pins, some don't, and at one point they changed their staking method, then back again when people complained (although it doesn't appear that the different method was ineffective, rather it simply didn't look like the nice staking from a MOACKS). Additionally, RCA said they were going to stop using forged gas keys at some point, and switch to CNC'd gas keys.

Food for thought.

UWone77
26 June 2013, 17:37
I've followed the thread on M4c. I believe the nitride has potential, but it appears the build of the BCG itself is what is in question.

JGifford
10 July 2013, 05:12
I have owned every generation of BCG from RCA at this point.

Gen 1: This was the original. It was entirely QPQ minus the firing-pin, and machined just like a regular BCG. Great BCG!
Gen 2: This happened when RCA had to change machine services, and it came with some improvements (radiused lugs, some had billet gas-keys and QPQ FP's), but also some quirks (sticking FP channel, top-staking).
Gen 3: This is the current generation. It is correctly side-staked, has a billet gas-key (really, it's a non-load bearing component. As long as the hardness is there, and it is, it's G2G), QPQ FPP, and radiused lugs, also the ID of the FP channel was addressed. It's a great BCG.

I recommend, as with all BCG's, that they be generously lubed, and that the extractor spring be replaced with the "gold" spring from Colt, currently back-orderable through Brownells (Mine took about 3 weeks last time).
http://www.brownells.com/rifle-parts/extractor-parts/extractor-springs/extractor-spring-assembly-prod4840.aspx
An O-ring is not required.

To date, I have only put about 4-500 rounds through the BCG's. No failures of any kind resulted. Things I noted were:

I had a new Daniel Defense rifle (middy 16"), and 2 new PSA uppers (Middy 16"), which I gave to friends. All rifles got about 200-250 rounds through them, while my DD got about 300-350, during some range-time. They were using the RCA BCG's I gave them, and I was using the OEM DD BCG.

-Cam-pin wear: The DD developed a ridge that could be grasped with a fingernail, and some peening. The RCA QPQ Cam-pins wore some of the color off, but retained dimensions.
-BCG wear: All BCG's showed some "polishing" on the sides of the gas-key and the rails.
-Clean-up: We ran them wet with Rand CLP, the bolt tail on all needed scraping for a white-glove cleaning (which I don't recommend, but wanted to test how easy it was with the QPQ), and was slightly easier on the RCA's. No other differences were noted as they wiped clean with microfiber.
-Bolt-lug wear: Much more polishing was evident with the BCG bolt lugs, even on day 1, were it only saw about 200 rounds, so as to equally compare round-counts.

No other anomalies good or bad were noted. All rifles functioned 100% except for: 1 of my friends failed to fully seat a magazine and dropped the hammer on an empty chamber. One of my friends induced a double-feed by babying the CH forward, then chambering another round when I corrected the action, before I could assist. They are both new to the M4 platform, and I was doing my best to teach and instruct as best I could. We zeroed, then did some VTAC 1-5 type drills, modified to include a reload, and for the public range's rules (very limited on staying behind a line, and not taking up more than 2 lanes, lucky we got that many, but it wasn't that populated).

usbp379
25 August 2013, 08:21
How well does the RCA stuff work when shot suppressed? Does the treatment provide good lubricity even with the added fouling?

Sent from my Torque using Tapatalk 4

usbp379
25 August 2013, 08:35
Also has anyone contacted RCA to see if they'll treat an existing carrier?

Sent from my Torque using Tapatalk 4

usbp379
6 September 2013, 05:04
I just received my RCA bolt and carrier and the bolt is too long to fit into the barrel extension. The bolt will fit but then binds up once it starts to cam over into the locked position. I tried it in two different rifles with the same results. Taking the RCA bolt out and swapping it with the bolts from the two rifles worked but I'd like to get a replacement from RCA since the nitride treatment is part of the package.

I sent them a note via their Facebook page. Hopefully I will hear something soon.

Sent from my Torque using Tapatalk 4

UWone77
6 September 2013, 05:13
I just received my RCA bolt and carrier and the bolt is too long to fit into the barrel extension. The bolt will fit but then binds up once it starts to cam over into the locked position. I tried it in two different rifles with the same results. Taking the RCA bolt out and swapping it with the bolts from the two rifles worked but I'd like to get a replacement from RCA since the nitride treatment is part of the package.

I sent them a note via their Facebook page. Hopefully I will hear something soon.

Sent from my Torque using Tapatalk 4

Keep us updated, RCA seems to be hit and miss with product quality.

usbp379
6 September 2013, 07:54
Keep us updated, RCA seems to be hit and miss with product quality.

Will do. Was really looking forward to testing the new bolt and carrier out this morning too. :-(

Sent from my Torque using Tapatalk 4

usbp379
7 September 2013, 07:02
Mr. Cerino replied. He says to mail it back ASAP. I'll update once I've got the parts back from RCA.

Sent from my Torque using Tapatalk 4

usbp379
12 September 2013, 17:21
Mr Cerino sent the BCG back with this note.http://img.tapatalk.com/d/13/09/13/yryju7ad.jpg

Sent from my Torque using Tapatalk 4

tact
12 September 2013, 18:30
Mr Cerino sent the BCG back with this note.http://img.tapatalk.com/d/13/09/13/yryju7ad.jpg

Sent from my Torque using Tapatalk 4

Wtf....

Slippers
12 September 2013, 18:36
Wow... That is an extremely unprofessional response. If they don't offer you a full refund at this point I hope you used a credit card so you can stop payment.

usbp379
12 September 2013, 18:37
Interesting the bolt won't cam into full lock-up in my CMMG 300BLK (what I bought it for) nor in a Ruger (RCA bolt put in Ruger carrier) but it will fit in a Colt 6920. I assume it is on the long side of being in spec. Still, I'm a little taken aback by Cerino's response. I guess I'll contact the vendor I bought it from and see if I can't get a refund.

Sent from my Torque using Tapatalk 4

usbp379
13 September 2013, 08:33
Nope. No dice from the vendor. They do not accept returns.

Anyone want to buy an unused RCA bolt carrier group?

Sent from my Torque using Tapatalk 4

UWone77
13 September 2013, 12:36
Mr Cerino sent the BCG back with this note.http://img.tapatalk.com/d/13/09/13/yryju7ad.jpg

Sent from my Torque using Tapatalk 4


I have no words... other than WOW.

JGifford
16 September 2013, 00:30
I have had issues with the last bcg from them I got, as well. I was treated similarly. I had to apply a lot more force than appropriate to administratively clear my Noveske and Daniel Defense rifles after chambering a round. Nearly required mortaring. I was told "maybe you should just write us off" until I told him what the bolt lugs miced, and he agreed to swap bolta. I never did. Just wrote them off. The carrier is nice, though, but screw them.
http://www.m4carbine.net/showthread.php?t=134889

GOST
16 September 2013, 06:14
With such poor hand writing he should learn to type.

mustangfreek
16 September 2013, 17:14
That is unacceptable on their end, i would be pissed.

usbp379
18 September 2013, 16:41
I received a NiB bolt and carrier today from Parallax Tactical. The parts fit in my 300BLK without issue.

Sent from my Torque using Tapatalk 4

JGifford
20 September 2013, 05:08
I received similar attitude for a similar problem (bolt VERY sticky when a round is chambered. Almost had to mortar to unload). Won't be buying more.

UWone77
20 September 2013, 05:09
I received a NiB bolt and carrier today from Parallax Tactical. The parts fit in my 300BLK without issue.

Sent from my Torque using Tapatalk 4

So basically after the handwritten note, there was no offer of a refund or exchange... just a sorry, sell the out of spec BCG to someone else?

usbp379
20 September 2013, 05:10
So basically after the handwritten note, there was no offer of a refund or exchange... just a sorry, sell the out of spec BCG to someone else?

Afraid so.

Sent from my Torque using Tapatalk 4

usbp379
20 September 2013, 05:19
I received similar attitude for a similar problem (bolt VERY sticky when a round is chambered. Almost had to mortar to unload). Won't be buying more.

Any offer of exchange or refund? If so, I wonder what I did to piss Cerino off.

Sent from my Torque using Tapatalk 4

FortTom
22 September 2013, 21:08
This is one of the craziest things I've seen in a long time when it comes to customer relations and needs. That letter is one of the most amateurish things I've ever seen, and I've seen some really bad stuff go down, in that regard.
Second, you mentioned that the bolt needed lubed and the bolt scraped, two things contrary to the manufacturers claims.

I haven't scraped a bolt since I discovered NiB. I was hyped when I saw the first post or two, but I'm sure glad that I read the whole thread through before I ordered one. It appears Spikes NiB are like everything else, backordered for eternity. Can't find a reputable NiB bolt.

Anyway, thanks for posting the picture of the letter, now I know not to walk, but run, from these foks.

FT

JGifford
22 September 2013, 23:45
Any offer of exchange or refund? If so, I wonder what I did to piss Cerino off.

Sent from my Torque using Tapatalk 4
He offered to echange the bolt after i mic'ed it while talking to him and indeed it varied dimensionally from the ones he had. I decided I would rather not deal with it so i just ate the $200. However, the carrier is very nice.

He did go on and on about how people are picky, hes never had issues with problem parts they send in, and at one point told me "we will honor the warranty but maybe you should just write us off."
So...I have.
I had no desire for a replacement bolt from them.

usbp379
27 September 2013, 20:26
I ordered another bolt carrier group from Brownell's and tried it in my 300BLK. The one I just received fits normally in the upper with no issues.

Here's a short I made with my cell phone. Note that the first BCG won't fully seat.

http://vidmg.photobucket.com/albums/v221/tokarev/th_KVID0294_zpsf1dca4c3.jpg (http://smg.photobucket.com/albums/v221/tokarev/?action=view&current=KVID0294_zpsf1dca4c3.mp4)

KevinBLC
2 October 2013, 15:52
I don't get it. They hosed you and you bought another BCG from them?

Vic
2 October 2013, 17:25
Brownells has a solid return policy as opposed to RCA so if he has a problem, he can always return it no questions asked.

usbp379
2 October 2013, 18:33
I'm still holding out hope for a successful exchange through Rubber City. I have emailed the president of the company with a brief explanation of the problem. I'm hoping he'll help.

Sent from my Torque using Tapatalk 4

KevinBLC
2 October 2013, 21:38
Brownells has a solid return policy as opposed to RCA so if he has a problem, he can always return it no questions asked.

Still, why would you support a company that screwed you over?

usbp379
3 October 2013, 05:54
Still, why would you support a company that screwed you over?

Good question.

For one thing, I now have videotaped proof that not all RCA bolts are the same. I will send the video to them if they continue to say there's no problem with the bolt.

Also, I'm not comfortable taking Mr Cerino's advice to sell the BCG to someone else. I don't want to just pass problem parts on to the next guy. Now it might be that the bolt will fit fine for someone else but what if it doesn't?

RCA needs to be aware of the problem and be held accountable until they make it right. Customer service is everything in the over-saturated AR market. If RCA can't figure that out they don't deserve to stay afloat in my opinion.

Sent from my Torque using Tapatalk 4

usbp379
3 October 2013, 20:31
Okay. I've been in contact with Cerino via email and I sent him a link to the video posted above. He wants me to send the BCG back again for inspection. I'll get it shipped ASAP and will update when I've got more news.

Sent from my Torque using Tapatalk 4

usbp379
5 October 2013, 12:39
The BCG went out this morning via priority mail.

Sent from my Torque using Tapatalk 4

JGifford
5 October 2013, 23:58
Good question.

For one thing, I now have videotaped proof that not all RCA bolts are the same. I will send the video to them if they continue to say there's no problem with the bolt.

Also, I'm not comfortable taking Mr Cerino's advice to sell the BCG to someone else. I don't want to just pass problem parts on to the next guy. Now it might be that the bolt will fit fine for someone else but what if it doesn't?

RCA needs to be aware of the problem and be held accountable until they make it right. Customer service is everything in the over-saturated AR market. If RCA can't figure that out they don't deserve to stay afloat in my opinion.

Sent from my Torque using Tapatalk 4
It's pretty clear that the customer is the problem in their opinion. Why not buy a DPMS to put that bcg in so you can help two companies at once? Seriously, id just write them off like Cerino told me to do.

I'm sending my problem RCA bolt to another company to dissect.

usbp379
6 October 2013, 06:27
Let us know what your company finds out after they've inspected it.

I am not ready to give in to RCA. The bolt carrier group was close to $200 and I'm not ready to write that money off just yet. I could, as you did, buy a new bolt to use in the carrier but I'll probably throw the bolt in the trash and sell the carrier if it doesn't work this time.

Sent from my Torque using Tapatalk 4

JGifford
8 October 2013, 10:44
Let us know what your company finds out after they've inspected it.

I am not ready to give in to RCA. The bolt carrier group was close to $200 and I'm not ready to write that money off just yet. I could, as you did, buy a new bolt to use in the carrier but I'll probably throw the bolt in the trash and sell the carrier if it doesn't work this time.

Sent from my Torque using Tapatalk 4

The carrier really is nice, imo

usbp379
11 October 2013, 12:00
The new bolt carrier group has arrived. This one appears to be slightly different in that it has a nitrided firing pin rather than the chromed pin that was in the other set-up. The carrier key is nicely staked.

I haven't dropped it into my 300 AAC Blackout yet but will see how it fits this afternoon. Hopefully this will resolve any issue and I'll be good to go. I'll update ASAP.

JGifford
11 October 2013, 16:13
Let us know what your company finds out after they've inspected it.

I am not ready to give in to RCA. The bolt carrier group was close to $200 and I'm not ready to write that money off just yet. I could, as you did, buy a new bolt to use in the carrier but I'll probably throw the bolt in the trash and sell the carrier if it doesn't work this time.

Sent from my Torque using Tapatalk 4



Ok,
My guy just came in and told me what’s what with your bolt…Everything is within spec…but it’s either minimum spec or maximum spec, which shouldn’t cause an issue…but may. The cam pin hole is slightly under size, but that comes from the coating.

*The company who performed this service for me will not be disclosed publicly or privately.

usbp379
11 October 2013, 16:37
Here's a quick video update:

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v221/tokarev/th_KVID0312_zps24fa6fa6.jpg (http://smg.photobucket.com/albums/v221/tokarev/?action=view&current=KVID0312_zps24fa6fa6.mp4)

Sent from my Torque using Tapatalk 4

JGifford
20 October 2013, 16:07
Here's a quick video update:

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v221/tokarev/th_KVID0312_zps24fa6fa6.jpg (http://smg.photobucket.com/albums/v221/tokarev/?action=view&current=KVID0312_zps24fa6fa6.mp4)

Sent from my Torque using Tapatalk 4

Doesn't really matter. Mine did that, too. Try to load a round into the chamber and that's when you have issues. Mine would even load okay, but you try to administratively clear it, and both my factory Noveske and Daniel Defense took all but mortaring to get the round out. That's from HAND cycling SLOWLY. I can only imagine trying to make clear after a drill when the round was crammed in there under normal cycling.

What really bothers me is all of the "across the board" specs on the stuff they are putting out. Why do some bolts work, some don't, etc.? Their tolerances must be massive to allow such variance.

Here is another issue, one with potential safety concerns:
http://www.ar15.com/forums/t_3_118/612998_Rubber_City_Armory_Bolt_out_of_tolerance___ Check_Your_Headspace_.html

usbp379
20 October 2013, 16:34
I have not yet tried shooting the rifle with the new bolt in.

Sent from my Torque using Tapatalk

usbp379
30 October 2013, 21:17
Not that it means much I guess but I finally purchased a 300BLK NO GO gauge. The bolt doesn't really even start to cam over with the gauge in the chamber. At least I know I don't have excessive headspace.

Sent from my Torque using Tapatalk

JGifford
5 November 2013, 03:56
Have you shot the rifle, yet?

usbp379
5 November 2013, 18:40
I have not.

Sent from my Torque using Tapatalk

usbp379
28 November 2013, 16:12
I finally put a handful of subsonic rounds through my 300BLK with the replacement RCA bolt in place. I had no issues with cycling and the bolt locked back when empty.

I didn't notice any issue with opening the bolt on a chambered round. I don't have a GO gauge so the headspace could be short but the gun seems to work as it should.

Sent from my Torque using Tapatalk

JGifford
30 November 2013, 01:14
I'm replacing the rca bolt and carrier groups I bought my friends. The teeth on one bolt are peening pretty noticeably at just a few hundred rounds. No function issues, but that strikes me as no good. Ill post pictures when I get over their way mid january. Junk product imo/ime.

usbp379
30 November 2013, 19:27
That's too bad. These look like they've got some potential but the quality control just isn't where it needs to be I guess.

I'll keep a sharp eye on mine.

Sent from my Torque using Tapatalk

JGifford
1 December 2013, 23:55
I agree. H&M is a top notch metal processor. They aren't too good at producing bcg components, though, or picking sources for them, and their customer service is a bit passive aggressive.

usbp379
2 December 2013, 04:15
...and their customer service is a bit passive aggressive.

Lol!

I actually got a call a few weeks back from Chris Cerino. He called to see if the bolt and carrier was working for me. Unfortunately I didn't recognize the number that popped up on my phone. I figured it was a pollster or telemarketer so I let it go to voicemail.

In RCA's defense I think the industry is awash in rushed production and quality control errors because of the political environment. Hopefully, as things continue to settle down everyone can take a deep breath and get things back on track.


Sent from my Torque using Tapatalk

JGifford
3 December 2013, 11:25
Lol!

I actually got a call a few weeks back from Chris Cerino. He called to see if the bolt and carrier was working for me. Unfortunately I didn't recognize the number that popped up on my phone. I figured it was a pollster or telemarketer so I let it go to voicemail.

In RCA's defense I think the industry is awash in rushed production and quality control errors because of the political environment. Hopefully, as things continue to settle down everyone can take a deep breath and get things back on track.


Sent from my Torque using Tapatalk

There is nothing that allows a CS department to say "Well I guess you should just write us off" to me, and to send a signed note to another customer saying that if you don't like it, sell it to someone else. I made excuse after excuse for the junk RCA put out, on multiple forums, hoping they would get it together. Instead, Shade stopped answering the phone, and Chris began. The CS dropped to the quality of the product. I can buy a better BCG for $109 for Ranier Arms if I need one, as far as I am concerned.

Pictures of the peened bolt in about a month and a half.

usbp379
4 December 2013, 03:00
I read somewhere that the Noveske shooting team is using the RCA competition bolt carriers in their match guns. That's actually what kind of got me wanting one in the first place. If they're using them there must be some practical benefits.

How many other people have we seen with problems? Have these given the Noveske team any issues?

Sent from my Torque using Tapatalk

UWone77
4 December 2013, 03:33
I wouldn't put too much stock in a shooting team's gear to translate into what I'd use. Completely different purposes.

I don't have a RCA BCG, but at some point I did want to try one, because I am a secret, well not so secret fan of whiz-bang coatings that cut down lube and cleaning time. However, with that being said, I see that the RCA is $225. I can buy a Nickel Boron Rainier Arms BCG for $189.99 (not including LE/MIL discount) or a BCM BCG, which in my opinion is the gold standard for phosphate BCG's. At this point, I'm not sure I'd spend the extra money for the RCA. The customer service seems a bit unorthodox.

This past weekend, RCA was offering a free bolt with a purchase of a BCG. That was pretty tempting has I was going to purchase a new bolt for another carrier without one. Forgot about the deal though and missed out.

JGifford
4 December 2013, 12:52
I read somewhere that the Noveske shooting team is using the RCA competition bolt carriers in their match guns. That's actually what kind of got me wanting one in the first place. If they're using them there must be some practical benefits.

How many other people have we seen with problems? Have these given the Noveske team any issues?

Sent from my Torque using Tapatalk
I dont know. I'm not particularly worried about what NST is using. I buy quality stuff that I know works. They can use whatever tickles them.

rob_s
4 December 2013, 13:41
There's a fairly lengthy thread on M4C regarding these bolt carrier groups. I'll say up front I don't own one, and have no personal experience, but many people in the M4C thread have purchased them.

My biggest concern is that they haven't been consistent based on the pictures that owners have been posting over the last 6 months. Some come with coated firing pins, some don't, and at one point they changed their staking method, then back again when people complained (although it doesn't appear that the different method was ineffective, rather it simply didn't look like the nice staking from a MOACKS). Additionally, RCA said they were going to stop using forged gas keys at some point, and switch to CNC'd gas keys.

Food for thought.

Those who are not required to hold to a standard, rarely do.
-Pat Rogers

usbp379
24 December 2013, 03:55
AIM Surplus has what appears to be a very cost effective alternative. Combine this with AIM's friendly staff and it is sure to be a winner.

http://www.aimsurplus.com/product.aspx?item=XAIMBCGV2&name=AIM+BLACK+NITRIDE+.223%2f5.56+AR%2fM16+Bolt+C arrier+Group&groupid=723

UWone77
24 December 2013, 13:24
AIM Surplus has what appears to be a very cost effective alternative. Combine this with AIM's friendly staff and it is sure to be a winner.

http://www.aimsurplus.com/product.aspx?item=XAIMBCGV2&name=AIM+BLACK+NITRIDE+.223%2f5.56+AR%2fM16+Bolt+C arrier+Group&groupid=723

Rainier Arms will be releasing a similar type of BCG next year.

usbp379
25 December 2013, 18:03
That's good. Rainier is a top notch outfit.



Sent from my GT-P3113 using Tapatalk 4

JGifford
25 December 2013, 23:14
AIM Surplus has what appears to be a very cost effective alternative. Combine this with AIM's friendly staff and it is sure to be a winner.

http://www.aimsurplus.com/product.aspx?item=XAIMBCGV2&name=AIM+BLACK+NITRIDE+.223%2f5.56+AR%2fM16+Bolt+C arrier+Group&groupid=723

IMO, that's what went wrong. As long as Shade was handling CS, things were pretty positive. Now we have a guy sending out "Screw you" letters with product, lol

knights templar
31 December 2013, 12:35
Isnt Cerino that guy who shot himself in the leg while teaching a handgun course? And never could win on that show Top Shot? No wonder he has a poor attitude.

JGifford
14 January 2014, 18:22
As promised. Here is a RCA bolt from the rca bcg that I bought for a friend. It lived in his psa middy and saw less than 500 rounds of pmc xtac m193. Pure junk. Heat treat or something must be off. Bad peening. Crap customer service. Varying dimensions. Pass!!!
http://i41.tinypic.com/2s0bsbb.jpg
http://i43.tinypic.com/2qd5oh5.jpg

Eric
14 January 2014, 19:36
Thanks for the update and photos.

Soisauss
14 January 2014, 22:17
Rainier Arms will be releasing a similar type of BCG next year.

welp......Guess I know what BCG/BOLT I'll be running in my DMR......

Just received my ICE ARMS BCG and hard to say I am impressed, if any, customer service is also on the brinks.. :/ Live and learn i suppose!

hopefully everything worked out for usbp.


now on to pestering that aims bcg.....UWONE, when you say next year, what range are we talking? Q1, Q2, Q3,Q4?

JGifford
15 January 2014, 03:51
I guess my natural question is...why do you feel like a qpq bcg is necessary or even desirable?

usbp379
22 May 2014, 06:25
I see that RCA is now selling an adjustable gas key. This appears to be basically a standard key with a small set screw in the back end right in front of the carrier screws. I wonder what's present on the inside of the key to keep the set screw from backing out of adjustment. My fear would be that the screw could walk out and come loose inside the upper! Yikes!

Anyway, the key is available for about $40 alone or it can be bought already installed on either the M16 or competition bolt carriers.

Sent from my GT-P3113 using Tapatalk

Kopis
19 May 2015, 11:21
I was looking at this BCG for one of my builds when i happened across this old thread. I just reposted it on RCAs facebook page and told them why i won't be buying their products.

JGifford
19 May 2015, 20:04
I was looking at this BCG for one of my builds when i happened across this old thread. I just reposted it on RCAs facebook page and told them why i won't be buying their products.

Chris really is the only ass at RCA. Everyone else there is great people. It's frustrating that he's the head guy pretty much.