PDA

View Full Version : BattleComp 51.0



GOST
16 October 2014, 17:18
http://battlecomp.com/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=18&products_id=72

MoxyDave
16 October 2014, 17:41
Oh sweet! That will work nicely on my Stickman rifle build. This will tame recoil a lot better than the 51T Blackout mount i have on there now. Nice find!

UWone77
16 October 2014, 17:42
Oh sweet! That will work nicely on my Stickman rifle build. This will tame recoil a lot better than the 51T Blackout mount i have on there now. Nice find!

Better get on that intro price [:D]

cagekicker204
16 October 2014, 18:11
Awesome I need a mount for a SBR project that might be slightly less obnoxious than the AAC brake

MoxyDave
16 October 2014, 22:34
Better get on that intro price [:D]

Way ahead of you man! My fav gun sports a BC 1.0 and it's super effective. This will fix the one issue I have with the Stickman gun: it's a bit jumpy without the suppressor.

SwissyJim
16 October 2014, 22:40
wish they'd do a Tri-Fecta mount for SilencerCo...

mustangfreek
17 October 2014, 00:14
Hummm.....

LMMzach
20 November 2014, 19:29
I read somewhere that AAC won't warranty anything mounted to one of these. Anyone have any info on that rumor?

UWone77
20 November 2014, 19:37
I read somewhere that AAC won't warranty anything mounted to one of these. Anyone have any info on that rumor?

I've seen a few times on FB where people have claimed they called AAC about the warranty. Allegedly, they will not warranty cans shot with the 51.0

LMMzach
20 November 2014, 21:18
I've seen a few times on FB where people have claimed they called AAC about the warranty. Allegedly, they will not warranty cans shot with the 51.0

Must be a "we didn't give you permission thing"?

Ride4frnt
20 November 2014, 21:41
Must be a "we didn't give you permission thing"?

I doubt that. BC would be in big trouble if they took the 51t design without permission. Probably more of a "we didn't design that compensator to be used with our cans, you're just using our mounting system"

GOST
21 November 2014, 01:41
A couple of years ago before the 51.0 was released BC teased people with a pic of the 51.0. They then said if people wanted one, to buy an AAC 51t muzzle device and send it to them. Then with some additional change for a BC 1.0 and labor they would cut them up and do a little weld magic. Don't know if the current 51.0 is being manufactured the same way or not.

toolboxluis00200
21 November 2014, 05:48
A couple of years ago before the 51.0 was released BC teased people with a pic of the 51.0. They then said if people wanted one, to buy an AAC 51t muzzle device and send it to them. Then with some additional change for a BC 1.0 and labor they would cut them up and do a little weld magic. Don't know if the current 51.0 is being manufactured the same way or not.

very interesting story

UWone77
21 November 2014, 06:22
very interesting story

It's not a story per se. It's what they did. You had to send them a 51T mount and a BC, so for what? $260ish you could have a cut and welded 51T BC for the price of 2 muzzle devices.

This method, they've cut the cost, but at $180 intro price and $195 MSRP, you really have to want this.

markm
21 November 2014, 07:15
Screw AAC. They're a bunch of retards. They're probably worried that BC will make a mount that's problem free, and they'll look stupid. Hard to believe I could look back on the old AAC slappies as a better circus than the current goofballs.

I like this mount. Shit... all you have to do is have another mount in case you need warrantee work.

GOST
21 November 2014, 09:55
Shit... all you have to do is have another mount in case you need warrantee work.

Good idea.

MoxyDave
21 November 2014, 12:37
You really can't blame AAC for the warranty thing. They have zero process control over their competitor's products. If BC screwed up even slightly and their mount moved the can off-center, could you really say AAC should honor their warranty in that case? That sounds kind of unreasonable to me.

UWone77
29 January 2015, 18:47
Took the plunge.


http://i1016.photobucket.com/albums/af282/richdkim77/IMG_2872_zpsmkfmcaxs.jpg (http://s1016.photobucket.com/user/richdkim77/media/IMG_2872_zpsmkfmcaxs.jpg.html)

GOST
29 January 2015, 19:07
Looks good, probably makes a great sacrificial baffle.

UWone77
31 January 2015, 12:00
http://i1016.photobucket.com/albums/af282/richdkim77/IMG_2873_zps2qb2ypec.jpg (http://s1016.photobucket.com/user/richdkim77/media/IMG_2873_zps2qb2ypec.jpg.html)

Dstrbdmedic167
31 January 2015, 12:05
http://i1016.photobucket.com/albums/af282/richdkim77/IMG_2873_zps2qb2ypec.jpg (http://s1016.photobucket.com/user/richdkim77/media/IMG_2873_zps2qb2ypec.jpg.html)

Nice!! Have you shot it suppressed or Unsuppressed yet?

gatordev
31 January 2015, 12:37
That muzzle device is way too clean! Looks like it needs to be exercised.

UWone77
31 January 2015, 12:48
That muzzle device is way too clean! Looks like it needs to be exercised.

Just picked it up a few days ago, no range time until Monday!