Battle Arms Development Lightweight Buttstock

[GOST]

https://fbcdn-sphotos-h-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xpf1/v/t1.0-9/10348376_898718606815448_1826721510031268273_n.jpg ?oh=a6429eeb9b7638073c9f333ed87badae&oe=555E838D&__gda__=1432749031_51589009db4d37eae86a1fe38f8378f 0

Coming Soon! Battle Arms Development Lightweight Buttstock! Here is the Butt Stock for the MIL-SPEC Carbine Receiver Extension.

http://www.battlearmsdevelopment.com/

[tact]

I like. Perfect.

[GOST]

I think if they built in a cheek weld that it would help this stock out. But even without it, it'll probably end up on light weight rifles every where.

[voodoo_man]

Saw this at shot.


This plus law folding equals awesome

[GOST]

Saw this at shot.


This plus law folding equals awesome

That would be pretty cool, it would offset the weight of the Law Tactical folding assembly.

[voodoo_man]

That would be pretty cool, it would offset the weight of the Law Tactical folding assembly.

Its not that heavy.

[GOST]

Their web-site says it's 10.625 oz for both the housing and carrier extension. It's location is a good place for the added weight though.

[Naytwan]

Thats interesting. Pair that with one of the lightweight receiver sets and you have my interest.

[GOST]

https://scontent-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xap1/v/t1.0-9/10423733_898966896790619_5453506493797517248_n.jpg ?oh=0b2d547a659a145ee89c30ea785bcc79&oe=554FA466

[n4p226r]

nice alternative to those that like those ACE stocks (for some unknown reason)

[VIPER 237]

I want to like it but I just can't.

[UWone77]

I want to like it but I just can't.

I think you summed it up perfectly.

[HeavyDuty]

This + A5 RE = profit.

[voodoo_man]

This + A5 RE + Law Folding Adapter - 6" in barrel length = profit.

FTFY

[GOST]

Wonder if they're making new receiver extensions for these stocks? Or do these work on pistol and rifle length extensions also?

[din]

yeah, they posted some photos on their IG and facepalm. The stock for their RE is a little different from the one for mil-spec tubes.

[HeavyDuty]

FTFY

That would be a great SBR setup, it's true!

[GOST]

These will probably be popular with the light weight guys, but I wonder if it's much lighter than a MFT Minimalist Stock? Is giving up a cheek weld, adjustability and a rubber pad worth saving maybe 3oz?

[Eric]

That looks uncomfortable as heck and it might make the balance seem off, but I guess it will sell for those that think they need absolute minimal weight. During real use, weight savings is most noticeable toward the front of the gun.

[Hmac]

I think that weight, or lack of it, at that end of the rifle is irrelevant to those who aren't carrying the thing all day. I'm sure there's a use and a market for this thing....I just can't quite figure what it is.

[GOST]

In-stock at B.A.D.

http://www.battlearmsdevelopment.com/bad-lbs-mil-lightweight-butt-stock-for-milspec-receiver-extension