Aimpoint CompM5

[GOST]

The CompM5™ is a high performance red dot sight developed for military and law enforcement applications. Aimpoint red dot sights are designed for the “both eyes open” method which greatly enhances situational awareness and target acquisition. Thanks to the optical design the red dot follows the movement of the user’s eye while remaining fixed on target, eliminating any need for centering.
The CompM5 allows for unlimited eye relief and is compatible with Aimpoint 3XMag-1 and 6XMag-1 magnifiers as well as all generations of Night Vision Devices (NVD).
The battery life for the CompM5 is over 5 years of continuous use while at the pos. 7, more than 1 year of use at pos. 8, and more than 10 years at NVD settings (pos. 1 to 4).

UNIQUE FEATURES

Mountable on MIL-STD 1913 Rail system/Picatinny rail
Advanced optical lenses with a protective front window
High, AAA battery compartment
Compatible with every generation of NVD
2 MOA dot for close combat and long distance engagement
Matches perfectly with Aimpoint® 3XMag-1 and 6XMag-1 magnifiers
Excellent light transmission
Extremely robust housing design, same ruggedness as the CompM4 sights with less weight
Submersible to a depth of 45 m (150 ft)
Mount base is keyed into to the body of the sight to absorb recoil
Weight 238 g (8.4 oz) standard configuration, sight only 148 g (5.2 oz)
ACET technology allows 50,000 hours (over 5 years) of constant operation with one battery
4 NVD settings and 6 daylight settings
Mechanical switch for speed and reliability

https://us.aimpoint.com/product/aimpoint-compm5/

[GOST]

It's being rumored that the MSRP of the CompM5 with LRP mount and 39mm spacer is $1,068.00.

[Tyrannosaur]

Damn! Was really into this until that msrp... man do I want one though

[Vel]

I'll stick with my m4s for those kind of prices.

[UWone77]

[UWone77]

Got these photos from a group I'm in. Guy has been using them in his assignment for several months allegedly. Looks nice, but the price. Ouch.

[GOST]

Wish it would have had a slightly bigger lens.

[voodoo_man]

Was there an issue with the t2 which prompted this type of added, everything, including price?

[Joelski]

They sure seem awful proud of it. Nothing compelling over a T1, IMO. For that money, I'd rather buy an ACOG. I grew out of buying bold, new graphics/fluff years ago.

[voodoo_man]

They sure seem awful proud of it. Nothing compelling over a T1, IMO. For that money, I'd rather buy an ACOG. I grew out of buying bold, new graphics/fluff years ago.

Acog?

You meant to say variable magnified optic...

[Joelski]

Nope. I'd rather have an ACOG because I don't have one yet.

[voodoo_man]

Nope. I'd rather have an ACOG because I don't have one yet.

That's why you want one.

I'll never buy an ACOG again. A decent 1-6x pisses all over it.

[Stone]

Um, what are we covering up here??

[UWone77]

Nope. I'd rather have an ACOG because I don't have one yet.

Kudos to service members who can shoot with an ACOG.

I can't get on board with an ACOG. Still have a TA-31, but probably wouldn't do another. As voodoo man pointed out, a decent 1-6 all day for me over an ACOG.

[gatordev]

They sure seem awful proud of it. Nothing compelling over a T1, IMO. For that money, I'd rather buy an ACOG. I grew out of buying bold, new graphics/fluff years ago.

A T-2 works significantly better with a magnifier than the T-1 does, especially for those with more "well-worn" eyes.