Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    Mn.
    Posts
    1,214
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    If you thought you had it bad...

    Watched this video yesterday and was blown away at how bad firearm owners in CA. have it.
    Its about 20 minutes long but well worth the watch.

    The best way to survive a violent encounter is to be the one inflicting the most violence.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    SC
    Posts
    2,233
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    I would like to hear an attorney’s take on the audio/video recording of the interview process as well as the firearms course he said he didn’t need to pay for prior to the interview that the police said he needed. I don’t know enough about CA law to know who’s right.

    I can say however, playing F*ck F*ck games with the cops, no matter WHERE you are, generally always has consequences. And I’m sure he doesn’t care, since the longer they make him wait, the more they make his point for him. Which is pretty stupid on their part. He wouldn’t have two years worth of footage by this point if they’d just done it.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    Mn.
    Posts
    1,214
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    He shows the statute at 1:06 that he is not required to pay for training before the determination. Which makes sense because why should someone have to pay for training only to be denied. It looks like its required after the approval or determination but before they issue the permit. When the guy at the window first says he doesn't know who he is but then goes on to say he had a conversation with the detective earlier about him clearly shows the are fracking with him. I don't think he is screwing with them, he needed to video tape it or how else would he prove his case? It would be his word against theirs and we all know how that goes...
    The best way to survive a violent encounter is to be the one inflicting the most violence.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    In a warm, moist environment... Usually.
    Posts
    3,083
    Downloads
    2
    Uploads
    0
    The video has nothing to do with restrictive laws. That video is all about bullshit run-around by a liberal-infested LE organization. State party line for sure, but politics and public safety should never mix. Otherwise, how can justice be blind?

    I know... outdated concept.
    There's no "Team" in F**K YOU!

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    SC
    Posts
    2,233
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    I understand he showed that. But I know nothing about CA laws. Obviously there’s the statute but it’s something they’re enforcing at the PD. Perhaps there’s a clause guaranteeing a refund if the permit is rejected. What I’m saying is I don’t know enough about CA law to take everything he says at face value. He’s got a chip on his shoulder and he’s got bias. IF what he says is all accurate and checks out, yes it’s BS. That’s why a third party opinion from like a CA lawyer would help, that’s all

    Quote Originally Posted by Stone View Post
    He shows the statute at 1:06 that he is not required to pay for training before the determination. Which makes sense because why should someone have to pay for training only to be denied. It looks like its required after the approval or determination but before they issue the permit. When the guy at the window first says he doesn't know who he is but then goes on to say he had a conversation with the detective earlier about him clearly shows the are fracking with him. I don't think he is screwing with them, he needed to video tape it or how else would he prove his case? It would be his word against theirs and we all know how that goes...

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •