Results 31 to 45 of 45
Thread: Remington ACR
-
19 August 2009, 21:14 #31
-
22 August 2009, 12:25 #32
How backwards compatible are the gas systems/barrels going to be? Say, if I wanted all my barrel hardware to originate from Grants Pass, could that be done fairly easily (despite the cost)?
-
23 August 2009, 02:23 #33Contributing Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2009
- Location
- Seattle, Washington
- Posts
- 116
- Downloads
- 0
- Uploads
- 0
Adaptive barrels... hmmm. That's quite a nice feature in and of itself, but wouldn't you have to zero your optics again?
In my opinion, having adaptive upper receivers makes much more sense--more money, but nonetheless more sense.
I love how everything is ambi and the relocation of the charging handle, but it really doesn't seem much more modular than the AR platform.
Lastly, since it appears that much of the ACR is polymer, I wonder what the overall weight is; it looks lighter than your typical M4 variety.
-rebelEMPIRE
-
23 August 2009, 23:11 #34
Combine an interchangeable barrel with separate operating groups, and you can make the same upper run 5.56, 6.8, 6.5, 5.45 by changing only those parts. THAT'S modular.
Ambi is nice, but couple the bolt catch and charging handle locations together. Now try clearing a double feed... you see where I'm going with this.
From the old technote, it's almost a pound lighter in 14.5" form.
Also, barrel reattachment is within 1 MOA, so zero is workable for up-close (would zero with longest barrel, can switch to shorter in a pinch without re-zeroing). Past 300m, the different external ballistics based on barrel lengths are more of a concern, but since it retains a close enough zero, switching to a shorter barrel is fine.
-
24 August 2009, 07:52 #35Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Posts
- 60
- Downloads
- 0
- Uploads
- 0
There is a lot more steel in the ACR than in your typical AR, the piston system weighs more than a simple gas tube, Magpul's polymers are quite dense, and the adjustable stock has many more parts than a standard M4 sliding stock. I'm willing to bet the weights come out pretty close, if not slighly in favor of an M4.
-
24 August 2009, 15:53 #36
At much as I want this gun and have funds socked away for it I am not holding my breath on this one..
"In God we trust, everyone else keep your hands where we can see them."
-
24 August 2009, 19:08 #37Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2007
- Posts
- 18
- Downloads
- 0
- Uploads
- 0
-
25 August 2009, 02:53 #38
the Masada was there, but strapped to the rack and non-removable at the very top of the rack.
WWW.TACTICALYELLOWVISOR.NET
-
25 August 2009, 04:14 #39
If, as Stick suggests, we do get a civil version that is every bit the equal of the Remington contract contender, then I suppose my enthusiasm will build rapidly ... at which point, we end up with the second major problem: dealing with supply and demand issues, and trying to find one at a fair price. I'm not suggesting that market forces are somehow the bad guy here, but if the ACR goes the way of the SCAR -- which it inevitably will -- then the feeding frenzy is sure to keep prices high, and availability relatively low, as hoarders work their magic on Gunbroker.
Here's hoping that my atypical pessimism is unwarranted.
ACStand your ground; don't fire unless fired upon, but if they mean to have a war, let it begin here. -- Captain John Parker, Lexington, 1775.
-
25 August 2009, 04:53 #40
Not only market issues of supply and demand for the base gun, but support supply issues in terms of spare parts etc.
I don't think the uniqueness of the platform is insurmountable (assuming spares are available) since any good shooter is going to have a stock of spare parts, or a spare gun, for any gun that sees hard use. But it is certainly a consideration, and will definitely dampen whatever enthusiasm I have for my uses.WWW.TACTICALYELLOWVISOR.NET
-
25 August 2009, 05:23 #41
Spare parts? You weren't actually going to shoot the thing, were you?
ACStand your ground; don't fire unless fired upon, but if they mean to have a war, let it begin here. -- Captain John Parker, Lexington, 1775.
-
25 August 2009, 05:54 #42
Will this be out by 2012? I have a Mayan calendar date to meet. ; )
-
5 September 2009, 09:55 #43
Bushmaster is still saying Q1 2010. I'm pretty optimistic for later in the year.
-
13 September 2009, 22:46 #44Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2009
- Posts
- 3
- Downloads
- 0
- Uploads
- 0
My STEYR AUG
My STEYR AUG seems to be at least as adaptive as this new Magpul/Bushmaster/Remington beast. In fact the American made version of the AUG by MSAR has the option of 5.56 NATO or 6.8 SPC cartridges. I dunno if MSAR's barrels and bolts will fit my AUG but the MSAR is available new for a LOT less than I can get for my used STEYR AUG.
I've had my AUG since 1988 and with ten 30 rnd. and one 43 rnd. magazines, a blank firing adapter, bayonet lug and both standard and split ski sling it will be an easy sale should I ever want to part with "My Precious".
-
24 September 2009, 16:53 #45Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2009
- Posts
- 23
- Downloads
- 0
- Uploads
- 0
300 WINMag,
If you need a barrel or anything for your AUG in terms of parts call MSAR and ask for Dave he'll hook you up. The gas block is just a bit different for the AUG than the MSAR, but they can do it for the AUG pretty easily and have already done that a few times already for other folks.
Steyr has parts available for sale as well, but their barrels are only available in 1:9 and you can get 1:8 through MSAR (they did have some cold hammer forged FNH 1:7 barrels) and can get different lengths. The other thing is that the new MSAR barrels are 1/28 pitch so you can mount any flash suppressor you want.
Bushmaster ACR
I think we'll hear something concrete at SHOT Show 2010 about the ACR for us civilians. I would not be shocked at all too see ACR's out toward the end of 2010. I wouldn't hold off my purchases to wait for it unless it takes you a huge amount of time to save up the $1,500 to $2,000 (or whatever they'll charge) to purchase one since I think we'll have plenty of time. I'm looking forward to it.Last edited by SilentType; 24 September 2009 at 16:58.