Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 31 to 45 of 45

Thread: Remington ACR

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    5,596
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Titleist View Post
    You're a saucy flirt.

    Its true.

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    606
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    How backwards compatible are the gas systems/barrels going to be? Say, if I wanted all my barrel hardware to originate from Grants Pass, could that be done fairly easily (despite the cost)?

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Seattle, Washington
    Posts
    116
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Adaptive barrels... hmmm. That's quite a nice feature in and of itself, but wouldn't you have to zero your optics again?

    In my opinion, having adaptive upper receivers makes much more sense--more money, but nonetheless more sense.

    I love how everything is ambi and the relocation of the charging handle, but it really doesn't seem much more modular than the AR platform.

    Lastly, since it appears that much of the ACR is polymer, I wonder what the overall weight is; it looks lighter than your typical M4 variety.

    -rebelEMPIRE

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    606
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Combine an interchangeable barrel with separate operating groups, and you can make the same upper run 5.56, 6.8, 6.5, 5.45 by changing only those parts. THAT'S modular.

    Ambi is nice, but couple the bolt catch and charging handle locations together. Now try clearing a double feed... you see where I'm going with this.

    From the old technote, it's almost a pound lighter in 14.5" form.
    Also, barrel reattachment is within 1 MOA, so zero is workable for up-close (would zero with longest barrel, can switch to shorter in a pinch without re-zeroing). Past 300m, the different external ballistics based on barrel lengths are more of a concern, but since it retains a close enough zero, switching to a shorter barrel is fine.

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    60
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by rebelEMPIRE View Post
    Adaptive barrels... hmmm. That's quite a nice feature in and of itself, but wouldn't you have to zero your optics again?

    In my opinion, having adaptive upper receivers makes much more sense--more money, but nonetheless more sense.

    I love how everything is ambi and the relocation of the charging handle, but it really doesn't seem much more modular than the AR platform.

    Lastly, since it appears that much of the ACR is polymer, I wonder what the overall weight is; it looks lighter than your typical M4 variety.

    -rebelEMPIRE
    There is a lot more steel in the ACR than in your typical AR, the piston system weighs more than a simple gas tube, Magpul's polymers are quite dense, and the adjustable stock has many more parts than a standard M4 sliding stock. I'm willing to bet the weights come out pretty close, if not slighly in favor of an M4.

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    NY/CA
    Posts
    41
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    At much as I want this gun and have funds socked away for it I am not holding my breath on this one..
    "In God we trust, everyone else keep your hands where we can see them."

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    18
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by AR Performance View Post
    At SHOT last Jan, we looked at both, well we looked at the Magpul Masada, they would not let us touch it, but the FN salesman watched as and we stripped the SCAR in about 30 seconds LOL.

    The Masada has some great features but the rail system the bolt slides in/on as it was built made me go hmm?, I heard it has been completly redesigned by Remy or Bushmaster. It will be interesting to see how it works after the current builder gets finished with it.
    Just personal opinion, the SCAR is the way I'm going.
    Magpul or others, correct me if I am wrong, but I thought Magpul only had MASOUDS in the booth and not MASADAS... or did I just not see the MASADA there? I talked to Drake and Costa but only saw them with the MASOUD.

  8. #38
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    SE Florida
    Posts
    1,113
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    the Masada was there, but strapped to the rack and non-removable at the very top of the rack.
    WWW.TACTICALYELLOWVISOR.NET

  9. #39
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Bragg
    Posts
    1,205
    Downloads
    1
    Uploads
    1
    If, as Stick suggests, we do get a civil version that is every bit the equal of the Remington contract contender, then I suppose my enthusiasm will build rapidly ... at which point, we end up with the second major problem: dealing with supply and demand issues, and trying to find one at a fair price. I'm not suggesting that market forces are somehow the bad guy here, but if the ACR goes the way of the SCAR -- which it inevitably will -- then the feeding frenzy is sure to keep prices high, and availability relatively low, as hoarders work their magic on Gunbroker.

    Here's hoping that my atypical pessimism is unwarranted.

    AC
    Stand your ground; don't fire unless fired upon, but if they mean to have a war, let it begin here. -- Captain John Parker, Lexington, 1775.

  10. #40
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    SE Florida
    Posts
    1,113
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Not only market issues of supply and demand for the base gun, but support supply issues in terms of spare parts etc.

    I don't think the uniqueness of the platform is insurmountable (assuming spares are available) since any good shooter is going to have a stock of spare parts, or a spare gun, for any gun that sees hard use. But it is certainly a consideration, and will definitely dampen whatever enthusiasm I have for my uses.
    WWW.TACTICALYELLOWVISOR.NET

  11. #41
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Bragg
    Posts
    1,205
    Downloads
    1
    Uploads
    1
    Spare parts? You weren't actually going to shoot the thing, were you?

    AC
    Stand your ground; don't fire unless fired upon, but if they mean to have a war, let it begin here. -- Captain John Parker, Lexington, 1775.

  12. #42
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    CA & WA
    Posts
    1,162
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Will this be out by 2012? I have a Mayan calendar date to meet. ; )

  13. #43
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    606
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Bushmaster is still saying Q1 2010. I'm pretty optimistic for later in the year.

  14. #44
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    3
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    My STEYR AUG

    My STEYR AUG seems to be at least as adaptive as this new Magpul/Bushmaster/Remington beast. In fact the American made version of the AUG by MSAR has the option of 5.56 NATO or 6.8 SPC cartridges. I dunno if MSAR's barrels and bolts will fit my AUG but the MSAR is available new for a LOT less than I can get for my used STEYR AUG.

    I've had my AUG since 1988 and with ten 30 rnd. and one 43 rnd. magazines, a blank firing adapter, bayonet lug and both standard and split ski sling it will be an easy sale should I ever want to part with "My Precious".

  15. #45
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    23
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    300 WINMag,

    If you need a barrel or anything for your AUG in terms of parts call MSAR and ask for Dave he'll hook you up. The gas block is just a bit different for the AUG than the MSAR, but they can do it for the AUG pretty easily and have already done that a few times already for other folks.

    Steyr has parts available for sale as well, but their barrels are only available in 1:9 and you can get 1:8 through MSAR (they did have some cold hammer forged FNH 1:7 barrels) and can get different lengths. The other thing is that the new MSAR barrels are 1/28 pitch so you can mount any flash suppressor you want.

    Bushmaster ACR

    I think we'll hear something concrete at SHOT Show 2010 about the ACR for us civilians. I would not be shocked at all too see ACR's out toward the end of 2010. I wouldn't hold off my purchases to wait for it unless it takes you a huge amount of time to save up the $1,500 to $2,000 (or whatever they'll charge) to purchase one since I think we'll have plenty of time. I'm looking forward to it.
    Last edited by SilentType; 24 September 2009 at 16:58.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •