Results 1 to 15 of 25
-
17 July 2010, 19:44 #1
Micor Industries Flash Suppressor
I saw these mentioned in a thread about titanium flash suppressors, and was intrigued enough to order a few to try out. I got some in 1 in 7 twist (1N7) and some in 1 in 8 twist (1N8)
From the Micor Ind. website:
"By employing a series of helical slots that match the twist rate of your rifle, the new line of flash suppressors from Micor Industries not only reduce muzzle flash, but also improves accuracy and reduces muzzle climb. The Micor Industries flash suppressor is built to withstand the most rigorous combat environments as well as satisfy the demands of the precision shooter who is looking for an accuracy advantage over the competition. Provisions have also been made to attach a blank firing adapter or a noise suppressor currently fielded by the U.S. military if the user so chooses. For extreme condition applications Micor offers flash suppressors machined from 6AL4V titanium. Available for twist rates of 1:7, 1:8, and 1:9. The new line of flash suppressors from Micor Industries takes flash suppressor technology to the next level."
Anyone have any experience with these yet?
Triple Bravo
http://www.flickr.com/photos/triplebravo/
-
18 July 2010, 23:34 #2
-
19 July 2010, 14:42 #3
I wonder if they could make something similar to the TTB. If it was $200-250, they'd sell great.
S/F
"There is no greater calling than to defend the life of a fellow Marine" - LtCol McClane, USMC
-
25 September 2010, 15:17 #4
I just purchased one to use on a DD 14.5 middy I'll let ya know when I shoot it. It looks good plus it's 2" so I can perm it on my 14.5 figured it was worth a shot.
-
29 September 2010, 19:39 #5Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2010
- Location
- Dallas
- Posts
- 1
- Downloads
- 0
- Uploads
- 0
Im interested in hearing how it is too! Anybody have any suggestions for an LWRC M6A2 10.5? (didnt have the extra "tax" money to get a gemtech.. grr...)
-
2 October 2010, 12:31 #6
Very interested as well. They are sexy though! Nice pics too!!
Adversity introduces us to ourselves
Facebook: Loess Hills Tactical
-
2 October 2010, 15:22 #7
Any updates on this? Any significant impact on muzzle climb?
WWW.TACTICALYELLOWVISOR.NET
-
2 October 2010, 23:36 #8
Looks like a shorter version of the Saylor Machine flash hiders with a little cut out on the bottom. We had some designed a few years back but never produced them.
-
4 October 2010, 08:14 #9
I put several hundred rounds through a 12.5" 1:8 twist barrel the other day with the "1N8" attached. To me, it did noticeably reduce muzzle climb. However, I don't think it beats a Triple Tap or Battlecomp in that regard. I'm more interested to see it's effect on accuracy due to the twist rate of the ports. I'm hoping to test this claim out in the very near future.
(edit: pic added)
Last edited by TripleBravo; 4 October 2010 at 08:18.
Triple Bravo
http://www.flickr.com/photos/triplebravo/
-
4 October 2010, 10:57 #10Contributing Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2010
- Location
- Northern VA
- Posts
- 171
- Downloads
- 0
- Uploads
- 0
How does it do with flash?
-
22 December 2010, 14:50 #11
Just got back from the range where I actually got to shoot some in addition to my teaching responsibilities.
I had the Micor 1N8 (again mounted on a stainless steel carbine length gas system 12.5 inch barrel) and two Battle Comp 1.5s mounted on 14.5 inch mid-length gas system barrels. The Battle Comps are very impressive, but I've got to say that the Micor did a really good job too. I'm not sure if I shot with my eyes closed that I'd be able to tell them apart if somebody switched the rifles in my hands. Granted it was kind of an apples and oranges test with the two different barrels, but I would have expected a 14.5 inch mid-length to already have an edge on a 12.5 inch carbine barrel as far as muzzle rise. (I should say that all three lowers were set up the same with mil-spec carbine springs and ST-T2 buffers.) Certainly I need to get more scientific about it, but strictly from a "how does it feel" standpoint, I'm even more imipressed with the Micor now than I was originally.
I still haven't had a chance to set up testing for the improvement on accuracy claim. I may attempt that by switching between a standard flash hider and the 1N7 on the same rifle with a chrome lined 1:7 twist barrel. The stainless 1:8 twist barrels that I've been using are so accurate to begin with that I'm not sure any difference could be measureable.
I was working with four higher speed Police shooters today who were using Department issued Colt 6920's with 16" carbine length barrels and standard flash hiders. They all got an opportunity to shoot both the Micor set up and the two Battle Comp set ups. I think all four were looking at their Colt set ups a little differently by day's end.Triple Bravo
http://www.flickr.com/photos/triplebravo/
-
22 December 2010, 19:29 #12
I've been running a PWS FSC and have been looking to make a switch to either the micor or the BC. I'm still torn between the two but now may be leaning towards the micor. Which would you recommend for a 16" middy?
Thank you for posting this!-One Nation, Under God
-"The bad news is time flies. The good news is you're the pilot." ~ Michael Althsuler
-
23 December 2010, 07:18 #13Triple Bravo
http://www.flickr.com/photos/triplebravo/
-
23 December 2010, 09:20 #14Contributing Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2009
- Posts
- 237
- Downloads
- 0
- Uploads
- 0
I'd be more interested in the Micor if it would take a 14.5" to 16.1". I think I'll stick with the Saylors Machine Phoenix.
-
23 December 2010, 10:30 #15-One Nation, Under God
-"The bad news is time flies. The good news is you're the pilot." ~ Michael Althsuler