Results 16 to 30 of 32
-
11 July 2010, 12:43 #16
-
11 July 2010, 14:25 #17
I wasn't buying it because of noise. Im pretty sure the round being fired makes more noise.
-
11 July 2010, 14:40 #18Distinguished Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
- Posts
- 1,584
- Downloads
- 11
- Uploads
- 4
-
11 July 2010, 14:53 #19
Regarding changing out a buffer for less noise, thats simply obscene.
I don't think the ST-T2 works any better than the H2 buffer, but it works similar.
Another way to look at the powdered tungsten is like a dead blow hammer.
At the end of the day, you need to make sure that ANY modification, especially a buffer will ensure your carbine run reliably with the ammunition you use.
-
11 July 2010, 15:08 #20Distinguished Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
- Posts
- 1,584
- Downloads
- 11
- Uploads
- 4
-
11 July 2010, 16:20 #21
I love mine.
-
12 July 2010, 14:12 #22
I had to mess around with springs and buffers to find a combination that would work in a suppressed and unsuppressed mode in my 12.5" SBR. The Spikes T-2 and Sprinco "Blue" spring seems to be the magic bullet.
a 9mm buffer and "Red" spring wouldn't lock the bolt to the rear when unsuppressed. With normal buffers and springs the bolt outran the magazine.
-
14 July 2010, 20:28 #23
-
15 July 2010, 16:06 #24
No problem. I was having a bad day. Sry.
-
12 October 2010, 14:17 #25
I absolutely love mine that I have in my duty rifle. It has made a noticeable difference in the noticed recoil...and yes, no more ball bearing noise is heard, though that was never really an issue.
-
12 October 2010, 20:27 #26New Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2010
- Posts
- 19
- Downloads
- 0
- Uploads
- 0
Most (most) .223 cal carbines will run with a standard H buffer, H2, H3, ST-T2, Enidine hydraulic, 9mm buffers, and even rifle buffers. With some of these the guns are running "in spite" of the buffer, rather than better compared to the H buffer. A .223 carbine gun that is tuned and running well, could run with a 9mm buffer but not better. You will get more bolt bounce because it is not designed or weighted to properly (tuned) cycle. A ST-T2 might have some quality features vs a H2 doesn't but will probably run, reliability speaking, the same. Some may be able to tell the sound or feel of the ST-T2 vs the H2, but honestly I can't. My 14.5" carbine will run fine with a standard H buffer, H2, ST-T2 and the rifle buffer. I did try the rifle buffer just because someone said it would work. All that being said, my gun has a the spikes buffer and I sold some of the other one. My justification to use the Spikes ST-T2 is it sexy.
-
12 October 2010, 20:47 #27
-
12 October 2010, 21:11 #28
-
13 October 2010, 09:21 #29
i had swapped my factory M&P buffer with a RRA 9mm. it made a big difference in felt recoil, but of course changed the ejection pattern from around 4 o'clock to around 2. i have since swapped the 9mm for the T2 and they seem very similar. The ejection pattern is about the same and so is the felt recoil impulse. i have not had any reliability issues with any of them and i'm sticking with the spikes. i'm not sure what weight my factory buffer was since i gave it to a friend that needed a replacement.
-
13 October 2010, 16:00 #30Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2010
- Posts
- 23
- Downloads
- 0
- Uploads
- 0
I probly wouldn't have bought one, but it came with my upper and I figure (assume/hope) that spikes intended the two to work together well. In some limited shooting back to back with the stock carbine buffer, and me being an AR newb, I did feel a difference. I keep coming to the term solid to describe it, but that's pretty vague. The dead blow analogy makes sense, especially after watching that vid online of bolts bouncing that I can't remember where I saw it.
From a mechanics point of view having some weights with plastic between them in a tube banging around seems somewhere between un-elegant and silly, but it obviously works. If it's idel or "good enough" I can't say.
Is the regular buffer part of the original design from way back or a cost cutting mass production measure?