Gas Impingement Vs. Gas Piston

[Iversonj11i]

As an Infantryman, the only weapon system I have ever used is the Colt M4, which operates using the gas impingement system, but I have heard that gas piston weapon systems like those made by LWRC are superior. I want to know before my first purchase, peoples opinions of what makes a better rifle system, and the drawbacks to both weapons.

[Eric]

The direct gas impingement system has a proven track record, is robust and lightweight. Piston systems are proprietary and their claim of superior reliability are overstated. With that said, there are some great piston systems available, but I would stick with the the standard system if picking up just a rifle or two.

[TripleBravo]

The direct gas impingement system has a proven track record, is robust and lightweight. Piston systems are proprietary and their claim of superior reliability are overstated. With that said, there are some great piston systems available, but I would stick with the the standard system if picking up just a rifle or two.

As a guy who owns a few piston uppers, I agree.

Downsides to piston:
1. More working parts, some of which wear out and must be put on a regular replacement schedule. More working parts = more opportunities for malfunctions.
2. Add more weight to the rifle and cause slightly more felt recoil.
3. Not compatible with all available AR accessories (like rail systems for example).

Upsides to piston:
1. Keeps fire control and receiver area clean.
2. Some have adjustment for use with a suppressor.

Downsides to DI:
1. Have to clean more often than piston driven rifles.

Upside to DI:
1. Doesn't have the downsides to piston rifle...and long history of reliability.

If I had to own only one AR and/or it was an AR my life was going to depend on, I would go DI every time. If it was going to be a 14.5 or 16 inch barrel length, I'd go with a mid-length gas system, rather than carbine length.

[Curlyburns5]

Well said triplebravo. Although Pat Rogers may disagree on the cleaning regimine haha.

[TripleBravo]

Well said triplebravo. Although Pat Rogers may disagree on the cleaning regimine haha.

He likes to keep his nice and dirty, doesn't he!

[Iversonj11i]

Ok that's what I thought. What would be a great brand to buy Noveske, Bravo Company, Knight's Armament?

[TripleBravo]

Ok that's what I thought. What would be a great brand to buy Noveske, Bravo Company, Knight's Armament?

I don't think you could go wrong with any of those three brands.

[mlosi762]

Ok that's what I thought. What would be a great brand to buy Noveske, Bravo Company, Knight's Armament?

I'd go with BCM. You'll spend less coin, and still have a fantastic weapon. I couldn't be happier than with my 16" mid-length BFH upper.

[FortTom]

I think the only system that I would say a piston driven rifle would better serve you is a SBR. I would absolutely agree with the others, on DI's proven record, otherwise.


FT.

[Jerry R]

I think the "arguments" were very well stated by TripleBravo. I have both DI and Piston and would not hesitate to reach for either in a crisis. But I have been told I'm a wee bit retentive on maintenance I really try to keep things ready to go at all times.

[Eric]

Ok that's what I thought. What would be a great brand to buy Noveske, Bravo Company, Knight's Armament?

You forgot Colt.

[mlosi762]

You forgot Colt.

Of course another solid choice! So is Daniel Defense, LMT, Troy, Larue, Mega, Spikes, etc... Thankfully there is no shortage of quality manufactures out there. Everyone has their favorite. If it slings lead with consistency, reliability, and accuracy, then it's all good!

[Deckard]

I'd get a Colt 6720 also read this from Rob_S.

[rob_s]

. If it slings lead with consistency, reliability, and accuracy, then it's all good!

True, but some brands have a better chance of providing the above right out of the box than others.

[mlosi762]

True, but some brands have a better chance of providing the above right out of the box than others.

You're absolutely right