Results 1 to 8 of 8
-
9 February 2011, 15:18 #1
PWS & POF Enhanced Buffer Tube Review
PWS & POF Enhanced Buffer Tube Review is up. Post comments here.
-
12 February 2011, 03:01 #2Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2010
- Posts
- 4
- Downloads
- 0
- Uploads
- 0
That was a great review.. I actually have the PWS and like it alot. I don't have any piston systems in any of my AR's & my reason for getting it was the captured detent & the QD sockets.. And for the last week or 2 I've been throwing around the idea to get the POF because my sling mounts on the stock so therefore I don't need that collar with QD's. But for some reason, it's always been a peeve of mine & I never cared for the buffer tube to just rest on the detent the way it usually does. On these 2 units I love that the Detent is captured.. I've been searching for awhile and these are the only 2 companies that do that.. I don't know about anyone else but that was the seller on both buffer tubes for me..
-
12 February 2011, 14:40 #3Contributing Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2009
- Posts
- 450
- Downloads
- 0
- Uploads
- 0
Great review Thanks. I have an MRP Piston system and an LWRCi M6A2. This sure could come in handy.
SOS
-
18 March 2011, 10:38 #4Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2011
- Posts
- 7
- Downloads
- 0
- Uploads
- 0
So are they both secured simply by the fact that the detent pin is retained in the slot as well as the screws for the PWS? I understand that there isn't any torquing required, is that correct?
-
18 March 2011, 14:05 #5
-
24 February 2012, 22:16 #6Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2011
- Location
- hawaii
- Posts
- 10
- Downloads
- 0
- Uploads
- 0
i bought 2 pws 416 buffer tubes and the back plate wouldn't fit properly.i filed one of them down but had to go through the trouble to parkerize it again.now i think of kicking the other to the side because of the hassle and get me a pof tube.
-
25 February 2012, 08:47 #7
I have a PWS buffer tube around here somewhere. It was out of spec and wouldn't screw far enough into the receiver to capture the buffer detent. Suffice it to say that subsequent dealings with PWS over the issue were less than satisfactory and it's now sitting in my junk drawer. A VLTOR receiver extension, a Noveske endplate and the QD sockets in my VLTOR iMod have met all my needs without any hassles. If I were concerned about carrier tilt, I'd definitely go POF by default.
Last edited by Hmac; 25 February 2012 at 09:32.
-
25 February 2012, 11:05 #8
That sucks to hear about PWS. Both the issues and the way they handled it.