Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    17
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Adams Arms Tactical Elite 556

    Im about finished with building my lower and I'm considering on getting the Adams Arms 556 Tactical Elite.

    http://www.adamsarms.net/details.asp?sku=UA-16-M-TE-556

    I was wondering if anyone here has used these and would love to hear the Pros and Cons which pertain to this gas piston upper. Thanks in advance.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    1,648
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    That's a beautiful upper. Adams Arms has one of the best piston systems out right now.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    5,596
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    I continue to hear from industry people (not AA guys) that Adams Arms is making the best piston system available.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    845
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    3
    They OEM their system for several other companies too. It seems to be a great design that's not over engineered with too many parts like some other piston systems. You can plan on having to replace one $6.00 spring during your PM scedule. If you're a fan of piston AR's, you can buy Adams Arms with confidence.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Intermountain west central Idaho
    Posts
    36
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Gentlemen,

    I hope this is not too extreme of a thread drift, but here goes: I am in the planning stages for a build-up (will be purchased through Rainer) for a SPR/Police Marksman carbine. It's intended use is marksman/perimeter duties and will be 16 inch 6.8 (SPC II) with the Wilson TTU and TR24 Trijicon optic.

    I am considering the Mega Tubular monolithic upper/matching lower. Your comments regarding the Adams system leads to my questions:

    Should we stay with DI or consider a piston system? Are there any significant positive (or negative) attributes for a piston system on this purpose-driven platform?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    845
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    3
    Quote Originally Posted by Gray View Post
    Gentlemen,

    I hope this is not too extreme of a thread drift, but here goes: I am in the planning stages for a build-up (will be purchased through Rainer) for a SPR/Police Marksman carbine. It's intended use is marksman/perimeter duties and will be 16 inch 6.8 (SPC II) with the Wilson TTU and TR24 Trijicon optic.

    I am considering the Mega Tubular monolithic upper/matching lower. Your comments regarding the Adams system leads to my questions:

    Should we stay with DI or consider a piston system? Are there any significant positive (or negative) attributes for a piston system on this purpose-driven platform?
    I'm a fan of piston ARs. Saying that, I'd stick with DI for your purpose. My piston uppers all have greater felt recoil than their DI counterparts. For SPR purposes where you'll never have to go a long time in harsh environments without the opportunity to clean your weapon -- stay with DI to help you remain as accurate a shooter as possible.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Intermountain west central Idaho
    Posts
    36
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Thank you for the expeditious reply. It seemed intuitive (from what I have studied regarding this genre) that the greater impulse would affect aiming, but I wanted to be sure that I had not missed something.

    Thanks again.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •