Results 1 to 15 of 19
-
4 January 2012, 17:10 #1
Centurion Arms C4 Rail System - 12.0 FSP
Description:
The C4 rail system is a lightweight, rugged, 2 piece free float rail that when installed gives the uppers a continuous top rail. The 12″ Front Post cut out version is made for the carbine gas system.
Features:
• Material: 6061 T6
• Finish: : type 3 hard coat anodized
• Weight: 13.8oz with screws---1.1oz with standard barrel nut
• Length: 12in
• Width: 2.1in
• Height: 2.38
• Inside diameter: 1.37
• Rails: 1913 spec rail with proper T-marks
• Fasteners: grade 8 bolts phosphate finished
• MADE IN USA
Barrel Nut Sold Separately
Retail $350
-
7 January 2012, 11:42 #2
These are nice rails, I've been playing with them for a little while.
-
7 January 2012, 12:04 #3Contributing Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2008
- Posts
- 371
- Downloads
- 0
- Uploads
- 0
My friend sells them. I held his example one and it seems solid and light on his rifle.
Edit: Just realized that the one I held was a different version, but made by same company.
-
7 January 2012, 14:36 #4
-
7 January 2012, 20:00 #5
I doubt it's going to be any difference other than the profile/shape of the handguard (end-on), and ease of installation advantage for the C4 rails.
I'm just trying to figure out if I need one or two - the price these are at Rainier is tempting me to do the latter.S/F
"There is no greater calling than to defend the life of a fellow Marine" - LtCol McClane, USMC
-
7 January 2012, 21:55 #6
From posted data I can see some of the differences in weight, width, etc. I guess I'm curious about the more subjective views of what those differences feel like.
Last edited by Rodman24; 7 January 2012 at 23:49.
-
8 January 2012, 10:11 #7
-
8 January 2012, 15:40 #8Contributing Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2010
- Location
- Northern VA
- Posts
- 171
- Downloads
- 0
- Uploads
- 0
Could you elaborate?
-
11 January 2012, 19:44 #9
I too am curious what differences aside from the front QD and minor details like the small machining steps on the 1913 contours...
S/F
"There is no greater calling than to defend the life of a fellow Marine" - LtCol McClane, USMC
-
12 January 2012, 08:40 #10
A few different reasons including ease of installation for guys unused to rebarreling weapons, antirotation tabes, and no need to remove muzzle devices for pinned 14.5 owners. There are more, but those are the immediate ones that jump to mind. Clean machine work, light weight, and QD sockets are niceties as well.
-
12 January 2012, 21:26 #11
Here is one of mine on a RA lower.
-
13 January 2012, 00:34 #12
Hey Stick...there appears to be a part missing on your lower, there, Sir.
Triple Bravo
http://www.flickr.com/photos/triplebravo/
-
13 January 2012, 10:35 #13
The DD Lite rail is the most sturdy but requires FSB removal & reinstall which can be difficult for home do it yourselfers. OMEGA X is also a great setup but the Centurion is more stable in the way it attaches to the weapon.
They are all high end rail systems and you can't go wrong with any of them but I personally prefer the Centurion to the others myself as well.
-
13 January 2012, 11:37 #14
-
1 March 2012, 07:05 #15
Stick,
Is that a 12" Barrel? Nice set up."I have never heard anyone say after a firefight that I wish that I had not taken so much ammo.", ME
"Texas can make it without the United States, but the United States can't make it without Texas !", General Sam Houston