Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    391
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Savage dumps 300 BLK on poor accuracy.


  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    1,648
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Not a big surprise. Savage is big on accuracy and the 300 BLK isn't exactly the most accurate due to the huge jump to the lands.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    MN
    Posts
    98
    Downloads
    2
    Uploads
    0

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    5,596
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    300BLK is known for very good accuracy in super sonic loadings, not in subsonic. I don't see anything new about this, there is plenty of ammo out there which isn't accurate.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    606
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    A tighter twist might have helped, but I'm surprised they wouldn't have delineated the line between a much longer version for sonic loads, and a shorter suppressor ready version that may have had a wildly different barrel... Or maybe they couldn't get the latter configuration sorted even limiting the scope of the rifle to that role.
    S/F
    "There is no greater calling than to defend the life of a fellow Marine" - LtCol McClane, USMC

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    391
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    I wonder if the 300 is hard to get bullet concentricity with.... I mean... a buddy bought me a box of Subsonics because he and the guy in the gun store were LAUGHING at the massive bullet runout. They rolled the ammo on the counter and it looked like boomerangs.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    OR
    Posts
    91
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    I guess it's a matter of perspective. It's factory subsonic. Available to all the non handloaders out there, that outnumber us handloaders by a wide margin. It doesn't claim to be "match" ammo.
    For perspective how does 300 BLK subsonic accuracy stack up against other caliber factory available subsonic loads?

    You do need to make subsonic very consistent for accuracy. A lot of good handloaders have a hard time getting really exceptional groups (by supersonic standards), but I don't see 300 BLK subs as a target round anyway. The practical range is very limited by drop, and terminal ballistics if shooting anything but paper. Subsonic is for fun shooting and fairly short range quiet varmint control. Accuracy is fine for those uses and I don't see a reason to pay more for match quality subs if they were available.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    391
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Stickman View Post
    300BLK is known for very good accuracy in super sonic loadings, not in subsonic.
    The sub is where the "value" (perceived albeit) is for this round. If you have to go super to achieve accuracy, the entire premise crumbles.

    I'm just in an accuracy mode right now.... A long gun that isn't accurate doesn't reconcile in my head right now.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    5,596
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by markm View Post
    The sub is where the "value" (perceived albeit) is for this round. If you have to go super to achieve accuracy, the entire premise crumbles.

    I'm just in an accuracy mode right now.... A long gun that isn't accurate doesn't reconcile in my head right now.
    I certainly won't argue your opinion, as you are more than entitled to it. I don't get that enamored with the subsonics, but that is me. If you do, that is all good.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •