Decent light weight optics

[FortTom]

I am currently building a new rifle. The basis for this weapon is two-fold. It had to be light, and would serve more of a role of a close range "patrol" rifle. I have a Bravo Company BHF mid-length (light weight) upper with Centurion rails on the way, and the lower is a CORE 15 Lower. Stock will be CRt.

The biggest reason for the light weight is that I'm going to be having a herniated disk removed, and I always seem to hurt as much after a surgery as I did before. That and age.

My problem is that this rifle is already going over budget and I still plan on buying a NiB BCU and either a BCM charging handle, or PRI Gas Buster.

When I went "web" shopping for Aim Point sights, such as the T1 or H1, I almost fell out of my chair when I saw the price tag. Then the prices just went up from there to the $800 plus range.

I do understand you "get what you pay for", but there must be a decent alternative that will fulfill this purpose, for a non-professional shooter (retired), and still be somewhat affordable, without taking out a second mortgage. I did see that their "Patrol Optic" scope was around the $420 mark now.

I also have owned an Eotech, and frankly didn't like it, and sold it at a loss, just to get rid of it.

Are there any other recommendations out there? Please, again keep in mind weight. I can't use something like a sight and magnifying optic. Just a red dot, or possibly a recticle of some sort, that is both sturdy enough for non-professional needs, but
reliable enough if I had to bet my life on it.

Thanks ahead for any suggestions,

FT

[UWone77]

FT,

What the max budget then? I'm assuming a red-dot is where you're looking at then?

[FortTom]

Well, UW, I was hoping to get off with about $300. That may be a deal breaker right there, and I'd have to pay more. Red Dot would be great, but I'd consider others. I just like the lack of parallax problems with the red dot, and if the "dot's on the target", you'll get a hit.

Thanks,
FT

[UWone77]

For the money, I really like the Vortex SPARC. $200 with the mount included. Listed at 5.2oz

http://www.weaponevolution.com/forum...ighlight=sparc

[mustangfreek]

Does the sparc have a nice crisp dot? I had a PA on my .22 ar but the dot was too big and somewhat star shaped..lol

Rich, how does the aimpoint pro stack up here ? i know the other person wanted lightweight , but while i got you on the subject..

[FortTom]

Thanks. I'll definitely bookmark this page for consideration. The "torture" tests were pretty impressive for a $200 optic. Battery life sucks, but like the reviewers said, "you're not investing $600 plus" bucks. I'll keep this one in mind. Thanks.

FT

[gatordev]

The Aimpoint PRO is a solid optic. I have two of them and they've run great with zero issues. You *might* be able to shave off an ounce or two by switching to a Larue mount, but I don't have the numbers to confirm that. You also negate the price point by paying extra for another mount.

I have one of Primary Arms T-1 clones which cost ~$100 without the mount. It's on a 15-22 and has a decent dot, but I haven't run the gun much to say how robust it is. There's plenty of people out there that put them on 5.56 guns and seem to love them. Getting your hands on one is the tough part, as they're supply is hot and cold from China. I also have one of their 3 MOA COMP3/ML3/whatever3 clones with the three different reticules. It's running on another .22, but that thing has been SUPER solid. I've had it for several years and several thousands rounds (of .22, but plenty have used 5.56) and haven't had an issue.

If you're locked into a more "pro" red dot, I don't think you'd be upset with the Aimpoint PRO, it will just weigh a bit more than the T-1/H-1.

[UWone77]

The number #1 optic I recommend is the Aimpoint PRO. I'm not sure if you can get rid of something on your rifle to even out the weight, but I've seen the PRO as low as $350. That's a smoking deal for an Aimpoint, considering we use to recommend to people getting Aimpoint C3's. The PRO is a much better deal then the C3 ever was.

IF you can manage the weight, that's the direction I'd go.

[FortTom]

The number #1 optic I recommend is the Aimpoint PRO. I'm not sure if you can get rid of something on your rifle to even out the weight, but I've seen the PRO as low as $350. That's a smoking deal for an Aimpoint, considering we use to recommend to people getting Aimpoint C3's. The PRO is a much better deal then the C3 ever was.

IF you can manage the weight, that's the direction I'd go.

That's one I was looking at. Less than 6oz, a little over 11oz with the mount, I haven't seen any as low as @ $350, all have been around the 420 mark, but, it too is one i'm considering.

Thanks,
FT

[Eric]

My standard recommendation is always the Aimpoint PRO as well. It's a best buy with Aimpoint quality. The included mount is totally usable and the weight difference is fairly minimal. I'm happy using a Vortex on a .22, but not on a primary.

[Vic]

Tom,

If you can wait until a sale, you can often find a 10% coupon that will knock the price of the PRO down to ~$350, such as during the last SKDTac sale on Labor Day.

[Army Chief]

Another solid vote cast in favor of the PRO.

It does add a bit of weight over the T-1/H-1 series, but I find it a bit easier to use with aging eyes, as well. Pricewise, nothing else can touch it, and you're pretty much getting the bulletproof M68 CCO design you're already familiar with, along with the latest circuitry. As stated, you don't have to immediately throw away the mount, either. I've bought several of them for various projects (both my own, and those of a few others), and will doubtless pick up another one or two once I get some pending projects completed. They can be found pretty readily for $400 as I recall; a bit less if your timing is right.

Again, well worth the price of admission, and probably the best buy on the market right now, considering the quality.

AC

[FortTom]

Another solid vote cast in favor of the PRO.

It does add a bit of weight over the T-1/H-1 series, but I find it a bit easier to use with aging eyes, as well. Pricewise, nothing else can touch it, and you're pretty much getting the bulletproof M68 CCO design you're already familiar with, along with the latest circuitry. As stated, you don't have to immediately throw away the mount, either. I've bought several of them for various projects (both my own, and those of a few others), and will doubtless pick up another one or two once I get some pending projects completed. They can be found pretty readily for $400 as I recall; a bit less if your timing is right.

Again, well worth the price of admission, and probably the best buy on the market right now, considering the quality.

AC

First, thank you all for your time and responses. I've searched around, even some of the "alternatives" such as Weaver and many more. Most weights are approx. 8oz. but by the time you add a mount, you're at 14oz or more. The aimpoint Pro weighs in at 11oz., mount included.

Then Army Chief hit on a major point when he brought up ageing eyes, it's important to, and it applies to me. So I think I'll go with the Aimpoint Pro Patrol model. This build should be lighter and quicker handling than my LMT (built without regard for weight). And I'm over budget anyway.

Good catch on the weight Chief, and again, thank for all of the imput.

FT

[UWone77]

FT, if you're at or under budget, you're doing it wrong.

[Army Chief]

My primary "go to" carbine is a PRO-equipped SR-15E3, so in reality, I had the very same goals with respect to keeping the weight down. The SR is an almost unbelievably-light rifle to begin with, so the weight of the Aimpoint has proved largely to be a non-factor. That is partly a function of its actual weight, of course, but it also has something to do with where that weight happens to sit on the gun. I doubt that you will be disappointed with the results -- and no one ever regretted buying quality right up front over the long haul.

I like the idea of a good 1-4x as well (and have a NF NXS C in the mix for certain applications); but have yet to see any worthwhile variables that come anywhere close to "making weight" for purposes of this discussion. Once you get the rings and mounts sorted out, they all come out a bit too heavy for most fast-handling carbine work. Definitely doesn't leave you with a package that you want to be running a lot of drills with in a multi-day class. The PRO pretty much goes unnoticed in the same environment, and just unobtrusively goes about doing what it was designed to do with boring consistency.

AC