Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    18
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Troy standard vs micro folding sights

    so im getting ready to upgrade my hand guard (from a magpul moe middy to a centurion arms cmr 14) and looking for a set of buis to go on my rifle. what are the differences between the standard and micro folding buis from troy?? i know i want the m4 front but not sure about the doa rear. Id also like to upgrade to tritium in the future.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    10
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    The micros are mainly for weapons with an elevated top rail. Using them on a standard height rail might end up being too low for your site picture when your weapon is shouldered. And it would also affect co-witness on your optic, if applicable.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    18
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by tactical View Post
    The micros are mainly for weapons with an elevated top rail. Using them on a standard height rail might end up being too low for your site picture when your weapon is shouldered. And it would also affect co-witness on your optic, if applicable.
    thank you

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    TN
    Posts
    7,592
    Downloads
    10
    Uploads
    4
    If you're looking to upgrade you may want to checkout the Magpul MBUS Pro set. They're extremely low profile and very light to be steel. Here is a link at ROG one of our new sponsors. At $132.50 they may be the best deal on backup sights.

    http://www.rogtac.com/optics-sights/...pro-combo.html
    DEUTERONOMY 6:5
    flickr
    facebook
    The gift of mental power comes from God, Divine Being, and if we concentrate our minds on that truth, we become in tune with this great power - Nikola Telsa

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    1,921
    Downloads
    3
    Uploads
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by GR1M View Post
    Id also like to upgrade to tritium in the future.
    Tritium rifle sights were big in the early 90's, before red dot sights really became mainstream. A front tritium sight post is typically wider than a standard A2 type, but is usable. Rear tritium sights are just about pointless and more of a distraction, due to the close proximity to your eye.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Twin Cities
    Posts
    1,251
    Downloads
    2
    Uploads
    0
    Ditto on tritium rear for AR. Actually irritating. MBUS Pros are nicely low profile for fitting under a scope.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    FL
    Posts
    486
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    The Micros are, like the standard Troys, very well made. I have a set on a Robinson Arms XCR-L rifle....they work well on that rifle; better than the previous Magpul MBUS gen 1's that came with the XCR-L.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    7
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    I have the micros on a typical m4/ar15 platform and while they have a slightly lower sight profile I havn't felt it was an issue at all. They are built like a tank as all troy BUIS have been traditionally. Regardless I do agree with the above and say that the tritium is not really needed.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •