Results 16 to 30 of 33
Thread: NEW Surefire WARCOMP
-
7 February 2015, 13:52 #16
-
27 February 2015, 17:10 #17
-
4 March 2015, 20:40 #18Senior Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2013
- Location
- Bentonville,AR
- Posts
- 783
- Downloads
- 0
- Uploads
- 0
-
26 April 2015, 19:53 #19
-
26 April 2015, 20:09 #20
I need to buy a couple of these.
-
26 April 2015, 20:20 #21
-
16 July 2015, 07:37 #22Senior Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2013
- Location
- Bentonville,AR
- Posts
- 783
- Downloads
- 0
- Uploads
- 0
Surefire Warcomp
Weapon/ammo used in all videos: 16.1" DDM4 with mid-length gas system, and VLTOR A5 system using standard un-marked Vltor buffer and Vltor standard spring. PMC XTAC M193
Bare Muzzle
Surefire Warcomp
Flash mitigation at night
-
16 July 2015, 08:20 #23Senior Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2013
- Location
- Bentonville,AR
- Posts
- 783
- Downloads
- 0
- Uploads
- 0
In short, my recommendation is: BUY ONE! It delivers. Exactly. What. It. Advertises.
-
16 July 2015, 15:45 #24
-
16 July 2015, 15:51 #25
I've got a Surefire Coupon Code I've been waiting to use, but they aren't selling the WarComp on their online store yet. I think this will be a good alternative to their SFMB-556 Brake
-
17 July 2015, 07:39 #26
I'm about to (finally) build my rifle. I have a Lantac Dragon and a FOSSA 566 three prong flash hider. I wonder if I should sell them and get this?
Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkFacebook - Marty Callan
-
17 July 2015, 07:49 #27
-
17 July 2015, 08:17 #28
Unless you just like how it looks, there's no real reason to use the Surefire brakes. They are one of the worst at recoil reduction:
http://precisionrifleblog.com/2015/0...-muzzle-brake/
I realize this thread is for the warcomp, but it's going to have even less recoil mitigation than the full brake. If you want flash suppression, it's kind of hard to beat a $10 A2 birdcage.
The only reason I'd use a surefire muzzle device is if I had a suppressor, like UWone77 said.Will - Owner of Arisaka LLC - http://www.arisakadefense.com
-
17 July 2015, 08:28 #29
That makes it easy. Thanks to you both.
Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkFacebook - Marty Callan
-
17 July 2015, 13:28 #30
What I do find interesting about that article is that it also says that their suppressor has about the same amount of "average" recoil (of various flavors) as the SF brake. I don't find that to be the case with .308 at all. Both with a Thunderbeast and on a SF, I've found the can has noticeably less impulse than without, both on gas and bolt guns. I'm thinking the "reduction in overall momentum" they measured is the more recognizable force, since that's the one that's lower with the can they tested.