Results 1 to 15 of 47
Thread: BCG Question
-
10 July 2015, 22:33 #1
BCG Question
I am currently running a BCG from Rainier Arms.
The one I run is here:
http://www.rainierarms.com/rainier-arms-bcg-phosphate
I was recently looking around and I saw that Rainier also offers this one:
http://www.rainierarms.com/rainier-a...-phosphate-bcg
Realistically what is the difference between the two? Would I see any performance upgrade by going with the latter?
What's the deal between these two? Why is one "Match" and the other not?
I am very pleased with what I am using now... but if there is something to be gained by upgrading I would like to know what it would be.
-
11 July 2015, 02:33 #2
Hummm just noticed these also not too long ago
Appears at a quick glance and not truly knowing, the radius/angle cut better design, stamped vs (asuming billet stock) extractor and maybe gas key also?
im not totally sure, assuming someone will correct me or whatnot
-
11 July 2015, 02:52 #3
The difference between the two is the profile and additional mass of the latter is supposed to allow a more consistent bolt lock up. Some newer BCG's also have a slightly flared tail on the carrier that also supposed to increase this. I have no experience in how much this helps though and have had great luck with regular FA profiled carriers. If you're not currently having issues I wouldn't change out the BCG.
-
11 July 2015, 06:47 #4
-
11 July 2015, 20:09 #5
Realistically, the difference you'll sell between the two is one will remove a few more dollars from your account. Actual range use? I doubt you'd see any difference or a quantifiable difference. Both run, if you like the looks of the other vs the next, go for it as your wallet allows.
-
11 July 2015, 20:32 #6
I was thinking the same thing but I didn't know for sure so I didn't want to say it LOL!
As I said before, I'm very pleased with what I have now. I am not big on coatings and low mass or any of that other jive. I think what I have is good enough so I don't know how it would "fix" anything or do anything really that much better.
All that said I see BCGs priced all over the place. Other than the basics of using good material, proper staking, etc I'm not really sure how to separate out the so so ones from the top tier or at least the better ones.
-
11 July 2015, 21:00 #7
The Fathom enhanced BCG is getting great reviews. I'm not sure if they are made by the same company, but the BCG in the new Hodge AU-MOD 2 and the one in Erathr3's rifle look like rebranded Fathom enhanced BCG's.
-
11 July 2015, 21:01 #8
For the same money, I think the standard Fathom carrier is where it's at. Obviously, I'm a big fan of Rainier, but the nitride coating is really winning me over.
-
11 July 2015, 21:14 #9
What's the deal with the nitride coating? What is better about that than say phosphate?
I'm really just picking ya'lls brains some because I don't know what's special about coatings of almost any kind when it boils right down to performance.
That said I pretty much don't consider many things until they pass the WEVO test. I guess I just go straight for the top shelf LOL. That's mainly because I don't want the hassle of sub par stuff (maybe I'm spoiled in a way...I don't know), but buy good once, cry once...buy crap and cry a lot.
-
11 July 2015, 21:37 #10
Nitride coating is actually a surface treatment that is actually bonded into the surface of the carrier rather than just a coating, it is harder and slicker than both NiB and phosphate coatings.
-
11 July 2015, 21:49 #11
I know they nitride barrels. I assume it's the same treatment? If so I wouldn't really classify that as a "coating" per se. I don't know but there could be virtue in that. I don't know what the end result is by doing that to a BCG.
If the surface of the metal is physically harder though that's a difference that I need to think over.
-
11 July 2015, 22:13 #12
There was a thread where DutyUse did a torture test on the Fathom Arms Enhanced BCG without lube. In his review he showed pics where the black nitride treatment had rubbed off. Fathom responded and said that the nitride treatment was still in place because it wasn't a coating, that it actually bonded into the metal. Fathom stated how deep the treatment actually goes but I don't remember the actual depth. You can take a 1911 slide that has had a nitride treatment and polish the surface away to it appears to be black chrome.
-
11 July 2015, 22:22 #13
If nothing else the nitride treatment has minimal growth unlike coatings which allows more control of tolerances.
-
12 July 2015, 00:24 #14
Black Nitride is a brand name for Ferritic Nitrocarburizing. It's also known as Melonite, tennifer, or QPQ. Basically it's a process where you dip the parts into a salt bath at 800-1100* F. Carbon and nitrogen are absorbed at a molecular level hardening the steel in the process. The black color is actually from post process oxidation and is a side effect that has no bearing on the hardness or durability of the part. It is heavily used in the motorsports industry and is surprisingly cheap. IIRC 6 pistons cost around $300 to process about 2 years ago.
-
12 July 2015, 04:09 #15Senior Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2013
- Location
- Bentonville,AR
- Posts
- 783
- Downloads
- 0
- Uploads
- 0
Re-branded Fathom BCG's? Fathom does not make a BCG.
QPQ has several advantages.
#1, it is easy to clean
#2, THEORETICALLY it offers improved durability. Why?
a) A QPQ cam-pin wears much less. This creates less "slop" and subsequently shock-loading during operation.
b) QPQ treated steel on non-QPQ treated steel, sans any lubricant, has a lower coefficient of friction than does steel on steel, both un-treated. This means that the axial loading on the rear of the locking lugs is THEORETICALLY lessened. Which THEORETICALLY will lend to longer bolt-lug life.
The BCG's that FATHOM Arms sells are some of, if not the nicest/best machined BCG's out there, barring a hand-polished JP.Last edited by JGifford; 12 July 2015 at 04:14.