CMT "HEX" Upper

**nova_boss** · 14 January 2016, 09:24

I'm kicking myself for not jumping on these sooner. Are there really no more out there? I get that there are legal issues afoot but there are still lowers out there. One would think they'd have an equal amount of stock for both left over. Greatly appreciate it if anybody has a line on these. Trying to finalize plans on a build one way or another.

**JSchell1309** · 26 February 2016, 20:49

In for a line on these. Have a buddy that just built his lower and didn't realize they stopped production on the upper. If anyone has a line one any of these it would be greatly appreciated.

**UWone77** · 26 February 2016, 21:36

They did not produce equal numbers. As the mentioned litigation issues, these will likely never be made again.

**besthaticouldo** · 2 March 2016, 10:16

Originally Posted by nova_boss

I'm kicking myself for not jumping on these sooner. Are there really no more out there? I get that there are legal issues afoot but there are still lowers out there. One would think they'd have an equal amount of stock for both left over. Greatly appreciate it if anybody has a line on these. Trying to finalize plans on a build one way or another.

Yea, go another direction unfortunately. It's a great looking set. Shame they didn't make more.

**JSchell1309** · 2 March 2016, 18:03

Originally Posted by JSchell1309

In for a line on these. Have a buddy that just built his lower and didn't realize they stopped production on the upper. If anyone has a line one any of these it would be greatly appreciated.

Originally Posted by besthaticouldo

Yea, go another direction unfortunately. It's a great looking set. Shame they didn't make more.

Haha I was trying to find a line on an upper for you. Didn't want you returning that lower, that was going to be a nice set.

**besthaticouldo** · 2 March 2016, 18:33

Yea it was, it sucks, but oh well. The SMOS kit will be amazing.

**velocity2006** · 3 March 2016, 09:30

I would still keep that lower, it's basically unobtanium at this point.

**n4p226r** · 12 March 2016, 11:22

who were the legal issues with?

**UWone77** · 12 March 2016, 11:33

Originally Posted by wsaraceni

who were the legal issues with?

Hexmag

**n4p226r** · 12 March 2016, 11:40

ah. that makes sense i suppose. Kinda funny though, if i bought a CMT Hex upper/lower set, it would probably be the reason i'd buy a hexmag

**fledge** · 12 March 2016, 15:02

That's what CMT thought too... That it would be fun to have AND make a good business sense for hexmag. The latter didn't want that and I guess partnering on it wasn't what they wanted either. I think it's hexmag's loss from where I sit.

**SINNER** · 12 March 2016, 16:11

Hexmags suck anyway.

**Deadwing** · 13 March 2016, 05:44

Originally Posted by SINNER

Hexmags suck anyway.

LOL! I've never used one, but they don't bring anything to the table that would make me want to spend the money to try one. Seems rather shortsighted of hexmag to have CMT cease and desist instead of partnering up and getting some addition market exposure.

**Joelski** · 13 March 2016, 08:52

Not another moronic example of somebody patenting something that's been around for millenia!

Hexmag is rather irrelevant in contrast to CMT. I suppose they needed to feel that little bit of power. Sad, really.

**Calico Jack** · 13 March 2016, 10:36

https://hexmag.com/hexmag-files-suit...hine-and-tool/
Their are always two sides to the story and the truth may reside in the middle.

I also recall Hexmag using photos of the lower in some Instagram post so their may be some validity to their side.

Thread: CMT "HEX" Upper

Thread Tools

Display

CMT "HEX" Upper

Posting Permissions