Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 22
  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    820
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Just tried M-Lok

    I have been a fan of Keymod since it was released and have 2 rifles set up with the keymod rails. For some time I have heard people raving about how awesome the M-Lok system is compared to Keymod. So, I finally got myself an M-lok rail in the form of an SMOS. Tonight, all of my M-Lok attachments arrived. For comparison I have the identical Noveske Keymod rail in the same length.

    After installing the parts I have come to the conclusion that I still like Keymod much better than M-Lok. My first gripe is that I can't install any accessories around the area of my gas block. With the super slim rail and the M-Lock nuts, there is absolutely no way to mount anything in the slot over the gas block. Even if I shaved the screws. This probably isn't a problem with larger diameter rails. The second part that I found frustrating was the actual mounting of the parts. I seriously had to dick with my Magpul AFG M-Lok and QD mount for a while to get them mounted. I basically had to install the screws through the accessory to the nut, put the nuts through, pull back the accessory from the rail and screw a the same time (each nut just a little bit at a time) to get everything locked down tightly. Keymod...I just put my stuff on, tighten it down, and I am good to go. And, I can mount my accessories anywhere.

    I might be missing something, but right now, I just don't get it. Does M-Lok do a better job with a more solid lock up? Are there other advantages to M-Lok that I have yet to notice? Do people just hate how Keymod looks like a bag of dicks?

    I am not going to get rid of this M-lok rail as I have all my accessories locked down tight where I want them and I have already invested in those accessories. I just don't see myself continuing down the M-lok path in the future.

    I know this is just another Keymod vs M-Lok thread...but just wanted to share my personal experiences now that I have had the chance to work with both systems.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    The Unfree State (MD)
    Posts
    2,731
    Downloads
    3
    Uploads
    0
    I agree 100% with what you said. I don't like M-lok. PITA rocking parts to keep the nuts from spinning. Ones with pre applied lock tite are a nightmare. Nuts damage the internal surfaces of the rails every time they are backed off also. Had an issue with Magpul nuts bottoming out before the Pic adapter tightened fully on a new Aero fore end.


    FWIW the Arisaka mounts are the best I've used by far.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Posts
    2,070
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    That was pretty much my learning path, too. I've had two M-LOK handguards and am down to one that's waiting to get replaced with a KMR. I'll only buy KeyMod from now on. I have had M-LOK accessories pop off at the range because they weren't properly secured. While you can blame that on the operator, M-LOK is just a lot more fidgety to get installed correctly and all but requires visual inspection to confirm the lugs are properly oriented, which is pretty difficult to do on many setups. Since I frequently tinker with my weapons, KeyMod is the better solution for me personally. And the awesome BCM KeyMod panels cover up the only real negative KeyMod has going for it, which is aesthetics, and I never really minded the look of KeyMod anyway.

    I do wish there were some more options for KeyMod Harris bipod mounts on the market, though. I have a DD and will pick up a PWS next to try out.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    5,854
    Downloads
    2
    Uploads
    0
    M-lok definitely has the problem of interference with the gas block, this is assuming which block you use. I have never used keymod, but that said many manufacturers are now making gas blocks that don't have the interference problems.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    On the bank of the Mighty Muskingum
    Posts
    4,029
    Downloads
    6
    Uploads
    0
    There's a learning curve, and some tricks that help. In the end, it comes down to patience, and a desire to use M-Lok over KeyMod or quad rail.

    And luck, perhaps.


    Go here:
    http://soldiersystems.net/2014/06/19/magpul-m-lok-tips/
    There's no "Team" in F**K YOU!

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    845
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    I prefer mlok personally and feel it's a better mounting platform, and have since sold all of my keymod crap. I've just seen more than a couple of accessories or attachments ripped out or partially ripped out of keymod rails under hard use.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    TN
    Posts
    7,592
    Downloads
    10
    Uploads
    4
    To me both systems have their pros and cons. Keymod is a little easier to mount, but M-LOK is more solid. M-LOK takes less time to machine and looks a little better, but picatinny looks better than both. It's like whether you prefer Kelly Hu or Christina Hendricks, Asian or Ginger fettish.
    DEUTERONOMY 6:5
    flickr
    facebook
    The gift of mental power comes from God, Divine Being, and if we concentrate our minds on that truth, we become in tune with this great power - Nikola Telsa

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Posts
    2,070
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Joelski View Post
    There's a learning curve, and some tricks that help.
    Yeah, that's the point. Of course, while I think mounting KeyMod is much more foolproof, you can still mess it up primarily because most KeyMod accessories are unidirectional. And mistakes mounting KeyMod can be much more subtle and lead to rail damage by the time you realize something is wrong.

    Since most people mount very few items to their handguard and leave their accessories on for a long time, either system works well. IMO, if you think you might be swapping accessories frequently or in the field, you're probably going to be happier with KeyMod in the long run. But maybe I'll change my mind if I ever have a KeyMod accessory "ripped out under hard use".

    I find it interesting that there are some very well respected manufacturers on either side of the issue (besides Magpul and BCM). Geissle has only M-LOK handguards now, while DD, Sig, and Barrett only have KeyMod offerings. KAC was a little slow to get M-LOK to the market, but now offers both, as does SLR, Centurion, MI and I'm sure many others. So, while I have a preference for KeyMod, I don't think one can really go wrong with either.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    Tucson, AZ
    Posts
    234
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by BoilerUp View Post
    Geissle has only M-LOK handguards now, while DD, Sig, and Barrett only have KeyMod offerings.


    M-LOK is stronger, KeyMod is more convenient.

    Quote Originally Posted by Courtney Briggs
    The decision to select M-Lok over its chief competitor, Keymod, was credited largely to M-Lok’s preference among Colt Canada’s LEO and military customers. However, additional performance metrics such as tear-off strength and ease of manufacture were also taken into account. We will be following up with Colt Canada in the coming days to get more information on their selection of M-Lok over Keymod so check back over the next couple days for more on this story.
    Source: http://calibremag.ca/colt-canada-mrr...-railed-rifle/

    Quote Originally Posted by Jack Leuba
    Keymod
    Pros:
    Open source, not restrained by a TDP, which allows a manufacturer to improve upon the mounting method.
    Shows better alignment of mounted items, as the attachment nut is conical and tightens into a beveled recess.

    Cons:
    Open source, not restrained by a TDP, which allows a manufacturer to screw-up the mounting method.
    Requires higher than usual toque for a small screw to avoid loosening, but must remain low enough to prevent damage to the nut or handguard.
    The attachment nut and mounting slot must be able to withstand significant torque without deforming, which makes both highly sensitive to material and hardening processes.
    To reverse an item, the nut recess must first allow it, and the user must loosen and flip the nut.

    M-Lok
    Pros:
    Patented and controlled by Magpul, which ensures that everyone that is making an M-lok accessory that bears the M-Lok logo has to have been approved by them, which keeps everyone at the standard that they want.
    Attachment method can bear very high torque, ensuring that accessories won't loosen if mounted correctly.
    Attachment hardware can withstand high pull force.
    Items are immediately able to be reversed when mounting.

    Cons:
    Patented and controlled by Magpul, which prevents outside manufacturers from changing the attachment method for a specific purpose.
    Attachment hardware can be shifted (without loosening) with lateral leverage.
    Source: https://pistol-forum.com/showthread....l=1#post334953

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Posts
    2,070
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    I stand corrected. I hadn't seen the DD M-LOK option. It doesn't look like they are selling the handguards separately yet.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    1,583
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    M-Lok is much easier to use if you put some vibra-tite vc3 on the screws and allow it to dry. Then, when you thread the m-lok nuts on, the vc3 helps cam the nut into the proper position when both tightening and loosening. I always take a flashlight and shine it through the handguard to get a view of the nuts to make sure they are seated correctly.

    The BCM reverse threaded keymod screws (which combine the nut and screw), alleviate the directional mounting issues. They're pretty much foolproof and let us make mounts much thinner and easier. I really like them, and am gradually transitioning all of our keymod accessories over.

    People like to say that keymod takes more machine time because of the chamfer around the inside of each slot on the interior of the handguard. However, almost all of the good manufacturers do a flat cut around the inside of each m-lok slot. Geissele is a perfect example. There's really not a significant machine time difference, unless the extrusion is designed so no additional machining time is required on the inside (for m-lok).

    I will say that m-lok products cost us significantly more to manufacture because the nuts/screws are more than twice as expensive as the BCM reverse threaded keymod screws.
    Last edited by Slippers; 4 January 2017 at 08:08.
    Will - Owner of Arisaka LLC - http://www.arisakadefense.com

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Twin Cities
    Posts
    1,251
    Downloads
    2
    Uploads
    0
    My M-Lok numbskull moment: When I figured out that I need not tape the nut separately to a screwdriver blade to hold under the rail.
    “ When I comes to modern politics, I think the inverse of Hanlon's Razor applies...In other words, "Never attribute to stupidity that which is adequately explained by malice." - Kerplode

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Posts
    1,882
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Just tried M-Lok

    I only use m-lok. And can switch them out quickly now. But it's not like installing a handstop is a race against time.

    I use few accessories though, and when I do, I usually keep them in place. Then it's a matter of a smooth rail and aesthetics.

    I've read in various places that mlok outsells keymod 3:1.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    On the bank of the Mighty Muskingum
    Posts
    4,029
    Downloads
    6
    Uploads
    0
    The one thing I find myself changing with any frequency is from an M-Lok AFG to a 5 slot pic rail so I can use my QD tango down vertical grip. I guess it sounds like I need to build another upper/rifle!
    There's no "Team" in F**K YOU!

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    1,583
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by fledge View Post
    I've read in various places that mlok outsells keymod 3:1.
    That was based on an informal poll of a few accessory manufacturers, but didn't include the biggest proponents of either interface (BCM and Magpul).

    It's about 1:1 for us. And I get about an equal amount of tech support emails from people that have difficulty installing, but most of the time it's stripped or lost screws.

    Have also had an equal number of people with accessories that don't stay tight, always caused by lack of thread locker and/or incorrect torque.
    Will - Owner of Arisaka LLC - http://www.arisakadefense.com

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •