Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 345
Results 61 to 71 of 71
  1. #61
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    5,524
    Downloads
    2
    Uploads
    0
    I did my first load development today. I did a velocity test and two other tests. I am using 112 grain Match Burners because that's all I got.

    With 29 grains of CFE 223 I got 2668 velocity. I backed off a lot and didn't get to max because that grain weight of bullet is not listed anywhere.

    On the very first 5 shot string I looked at the chronograph and my SD was 7. That's pretty good.

    I just seated the bullets to magazine length and went for it. I am far from being anywhere near completed, but with the factory ammo I was getting under an MOA with that, and with these first few shots I think it has potential. We will see how it turns out.

    Those bullets might work good and they might not. The overall shape of the bullet doesn't give much leeway on seating depth. This is literally the first day shooting those so we shall see.

  2. #62
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    429
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by alamo5000 View Post
    I did my first load development today. I did a velocity test and two other tests. I am using 112 grain Match Burners because that's all I got.

    With 29 grains of CFE 223 I got 2668 velocity. I backed off a lot and didn't get to max because that grain weight of bullet is not listed anywhere.

    On the very first 5 shot string I looked at the chronograph and my SD was 7. That's pretty good.

    I just seated the bullets to magazine length and went for it. I am far from being anywhere near completed, but with the factory ammo I was getting under an MOA with that, and with these first few shots I think it has potential. We will see how it turns out.

    Those bullets might work good and they might not. The overall shape of the bullet doesn't give much leeway on seating depth. This is literally the first day shooting those so we shall see.
    Berger 109s seem to be a favorite. Hopefully the 112s will work. Price is certainly good for that particular bullet.

    Sent from my SM-G970U using Tapatalk

  3. #63
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    5,524
    Downloads
    2
    Uploads
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by usbp379 View Post
    Berger 109s seem to be a favorite. Hopefully the 112s will work. Price is certainly good for that particular bullet.

    Sent from my SM-G970U using Tapatalk
    109s are definitely on my list. I have 300 of the Match Burners. I will be on the lookout for more options to test. I am open to anything 107 and up. If I can get good results from the 112s that will be awesome. They are cheap and have a high-ish BC.

  4. #64
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    429
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by alamo5000 View Post
    109s are definitely on my list. I have 300 of the Match Burners. I will be on the lookout for more options to test. I am open to anything 107 and up. If I can get good results from the 112s that will be awesome. They are cheap and have a high-ish BC.
    I'd think the Vapor Trail 103s might be worth a try.

    Sent from my SM-G970U using Tapatalk

  5. #65
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    429
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    More Eagle's Nest:

    https://youtu.be/oiRWRiVJ_28

    Sent from my SM-G970U using Tapatalk

  6. #66
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    5,524
    Downloads
    2
    Uploads
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by usbp379 View Post
    More Eagle's Nest:

    https://youtu.be/oiRWRiVJ_28

    Sent from my SM-G970U using Tapatalk
    His approach in this video is much better than trying to drum up 'controversy' by making off the cuff statements. If he had started out this whole thing by just doing it then he would have never gotten nearly as much heat for his comments.

    I personally won't write off the idea of changing some chamber dimensions, not by a mile would I write that off as a distinct possibility (or even probability)...

    Any time you are working with what is essentially the first wave of anything, much less barrels or cartridges, you should expect that things will get tuned up over time.

  7. #67
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    5,524
    Downloads
    2
    Uploads
    0
    I have been doing a little bit of load development. I have been extremely limited in supplies though because 6mm bullets have been vaporware. Also I have been really busy with other stuff. I started out trying some 112 grain matchburners, but then the other day I saw a box of Hornady 108 grain on the shelf in Academy. I bought them and today started out with them.

    This was literally the first load I shot with them without doing any seating depth testing on those specific bullets. It was the very first charge weight too.

    Name:  one.jpg
Views: 29
Size:  576.0 KB

    The group measured approximately .517 inches from outside edges. If you translate that center to center it's a .27 inch group. Since one MOA is 1.08 inches that works out to exactly .25 MOA.

    Name:  two.jpg
Views: 28
Size:  509.2 KB

  8. #68
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    825
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    1 MOA = 1.047”

  9. #69
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    5,524
    Downloads
    2
    Uploads
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by tact View Post
    1 MOA = 1.047”
    Thanks. I couldn't remember the exact number for the life of me. I knew it was just over an inch, not an actual inch.

    Still not a bad group for day one with some new bullets.

    .257 MOA group ain't too shabby.

  10. #70
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    825
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by alamo5000 View Post
    Thanks. I couldn't remember the exact number for the life of me. I knew it was just over an inch, not an actual inch.

    Still not a bad group for day one with some new bullets.

    .257 MOA group ain't too shabby.
    Very nice….

    I may have missed it, but what was your final setup to include glass?

  11. #71
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    5,524
    Downloads
    2
    Uploads
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by tact View Post
    Very nice….

    I may have missed it, but what was your final setup to include glass?
    Tip to tail I have a Griffin Explorr 30 with a 6.5 cal taper mount device. A custom 24" McGowan barrel, bead blasted with flutes. A Cross Machine handguard and a matching Cross Machine slick side upper. BCG is a RCA, POF Strike Eagle charging handle. Scope mount is a Griffin SPRM 15MOA, and the optic is a Vortex Strike Eagle with a MIL reticle.

    I am using the lower from one of my other rifles, matching Cross Machine lower, of course with a single stage CMC flat face drop in trigger. I will build a dedicated lower for this gun most likely. I built the upper to get it shooting and work out any possible kinks and to verify that I want to be in this caliber before I went all in.

    It's pretty cool having (easily) a 1,000 yard gun not much bigger than a regular old AR. I chose the longer barrel because I wanted to...but I think if you are not going to shoot past 1K you could get away with an 18 inch barrel most likely.

    If I can score some more bullets I will take this one to a grand and beyond. All I have available on a regular basis is 1,400 yards so I think this will get there.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •