Results 1 to 14 of 14
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Posts
    119
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Range Report: Black Hills MK262 Mod 1

    Range Report: Black Hills MK262 Mod 1





    The 77 grain MK262 ammunition produced by Black Hills Ammunition has been referred to as the most accurate mass-produced 5.56mm ammunition that has ever been type-classified and issued by the US Army. Since its inception, genuine MK262 has been manufactured solely by Black Hills Ammunition. For years, MK262 was only available to the civilian population as “seconds,” but more recently Black Hills has made first-run production lots available on the commercial market. It is the first-run version of MK262 Mod 1 that I tested for this report.

    MK262 Mod 1 is loaded in WCC 5.56mm brass and uses a cannelured version of the 77 grain Sierra MatchKing. The round is charged with a proprietary ball powder.



    The 77 grain MK262 Mod 1 projectile compared to the M193 projectile.






    MK262 powder. (The squares of the red grid measure 1/10 of an inch.)





    The specification for accuracy testing of MK262 calls for multiple 10-shot groups to be fired; which is exactly what I like to do for a range report. An accuracy (technically, precision) evaluation of the first-run MK262 Mod 1 ammunition was performed following my usual protocol. This accuracy evaluation used statistically significant shot-group sizes and every single shot in a fired group was included in the measurements. There was absolutely no use of any Group Reduction Techniques (e.g. fliers, target movement, Butterfly Shots).

    The shooting set-up will be described in detail below. As many of the significant variables as was practicable were controlled for. Also, a control group was fired from the test-rifle used in the evaluation using match-grade, hand-loaded ammunition; in order to demonstrate the capability of the barrel. Pictures of shot-groups are posted for documentation.

    All shooting was conducted from a concrete bench-rest from a distance of 100 yards (confirmed with a laser rangefinder.) The barrel used in the evaluation was free-floated. The free-float handguards of the rifle rested in a Sinclair Windage Benchrest, while the stock of the rifle rested in a Protektor bunny-ear rear bag. Sighting was accomplished via a Leupold VARI-X III set at 25X magnification and adjusted to be parallax-free at 100 yards. A mirage shade was attached to the objective-bell of the scope. Wind conditions on the shooting range were continuously monitored using a Wind Probe. The set-up was very similar to that pictured below.









    The Wind Probe.





    The test vehicle for this evaluation was one of my semi-automatic precision AR-15s with a 20” stainless-steel Lothar Walther barrel. The barrel has a 223 Wylde chamber with a 1:8” twist.

    Prior to firing the MK262 ammunition, I fired a 10-shot control group using match-grade hand-loads topped with the Sierra 77 grain MatchKing. That group had an extreme spread of 0.69”.







    Next, three 10-shot groups of the MK262 Mod 1 were fired in a row with the resulting extreme spreads (from smallest to largest):

    0.96”
    1.12”
    1.21”

    for a 10-shot group average extreme spread of 1.10”. The three 10-shot groups were over-layed on each other using RSI Shooting Lab to form a 30-shot composite group. The mean radius for the 30-shot composite group was 0.33”. For those of you who might not be familiar with the mean radius, I’ve posted some information about it below.




    The smallest 10-shot group.






    The 30-shot composite group.







    I chronographed the Black Hills 5.56mm MK262 Mod 1 ammunition from a semi-automatic AR-15 with a chrome-lined, NATO chambered 20” Colt M16A2 barrel.









    Chronographing was conducted using an Oehler 35-P chronograph with “proof screen” technology. The Oehler 35P chronograph is actually two chronographs in one package that takes two separate chronograph readings for each shot and then has its onboard computer analyze the data to determine if there is any statistically significant difference between the two readings. If there is, the chronograph “flags” the shot to let you know that the data is invalid. There was no invalid data flagged during this testing.

    The velocity stated below is the muzzle velocity as calculated from the instrumental velocity using Oehler’s Ballistic Explorer software program. The string of fire consisted of 10 rounds over the chronograph.














    Each round was single-loaded and cycled into the chamber from a magazine fitted with a single-load follower. The bolt locked-back after each shot allowing the chamber to cool in between each shot. This technique was used to mitigate the possible influence of “chamber-soak” on velocity data. Each new shot was fired in a consistent manner after hitting the bolt release. Atmospheric conditions were monitored and recorded using a Kestrel 4000 Pocket Weather Tracker.









    Atmospheric conditions

    Temperature: 79 degrees F
    Humidity: 37%
    Barometric pressure: 30.12 inches of Hg
    Elevation: 950 feet above sea level


    The muzzle velocity for the 10-shot string of the Black Hills 5.56mm MK262 Mod 1 ammunition fired from the 20” Colt barrel was 2848 FPS with a standard deviation of 10 FPS and a coefficient of variation of 0.35%!

    For those of you who might not be familiar with the coefficient of variation (CV), it is the standard deviation, divided by the mean (average) muzzle velocity and then multiplied by 100 and expressed as a percentage. It allows for the comparison of the uniformity of velocity between loads in different velocity spectrums; e.g. 77 grain loads running around 2,650 fps compared to 55 grain loads running around 3,250 fps.

    For comparison (and to give you an idea of how good the CV is for this factory loaded MK262 Mod 1 ammunition) the mil-spec for M193 allows for a coefficient of variation of approximately 1.2%, while one of my best 77 grain OTM hand-loads, with a muzzle velocity of 2639 PFS and a standard deviation of 4 FPS, has a coefficient of variation of 0.15%.









    ….

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    TN
    Posts
    7,592
    Downloads
    10
    Uploads
    4
    Very nice, thanks Molon.
    DEUTERONOMY 6:5
    flickr
    facebook
    The gift of mental power comes from God, Divine Being, and if we concentrate our minds on that truth, we become in tune with this great power - Nikola Telsa

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    1,771
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Lovely article. Have always been interested in picking up some MK262.

    Any thoughts on throwing some MK313 SOST downrange? As a comparison to the MK262.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    Mn.
    Posts
    1,893
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Excellent review as always. How do you think the Black Hills 5.56 mm 77-gr. Tipped MatchKing would do compared to this round?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    2,825
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Not too shab.

    I did a nonscientific test with my 7.75 pws 1:8 .223 wydle upper using the mk262 and shot about a 3inch group at 100y with an fps of around 1800.

    Pretty damn good for the a shorty upper.

    This is a wonder round.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    FL
    Posts
    2,643
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    It would be interesting to see how this compares to the Magtech 77gr SMKs. Availability and price are fantastic and after it was recommended here, I grabbed some and found performance appeared to be near, if not on par so far, but my shooting wasn't anywhere near as scientific. I was averaging 2795 FPS on a 18" barrel in different climate (warmer/humid) day.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Posts
    119
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Stone View Post

    How do you think the Black Hills 5.56 mm 77-gr. Tipped MatchKing would do compared to this round?
    We shall see in the near future.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Posts
    119
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Thompson View Post

    Any thoughts on throwing some MK313 SOST downrange? As a comparison to the MK262.
    MK318?

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    5,596
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Great post Molon. Thanks for sharing the info.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    The Unfree State (MD)
    Posts
    2,731
    Downloads
    3
    Uploads
    0
    Yup. Molon's post were some of the best I've read on a few other sites. So glad to see him posting here.

    And is anyone else here as surprised as I am by how consistent this is for factory loaded ammo. Pretty amazing IMO.


    2848 FPS with a standard deviation of 10 FPS and a coefficient of variation of 0.35%!

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    5,854
    Downloads
    2
    Uploads
    0
    Superb!!!

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    4,782
    Downloads
    1
    Uploads
    0
    Good info..

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    SC
    Posts
    2,888
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    That powder looked like Alliant 2000-MR.

    Nice review

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    PNW
    Posts
    1,752
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Fantastic review. Thanks for sharing this information.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •