Results 1 to 15 of 26
Hybrid View
-
7 October 2020, 20:37 #1
Mr Guns made a very valid point about WHO sent this letter out. Specifically who at the ATF... the latter part of the video below raises some interesting points.
-
8 October 2020, 05:53 #2Senior Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2014
- Posts
- 534
- Downloads
- 0
- Uploads
- 0
-
8 October 2020, 14:18 #3
And instead of letting those like Gun Policy take care of it, the gun community takes it like catnip.
Did anyone notice the date of the letter Q received? Early August. How much of this is a Q attempt at marketing more drama? I mean, Q is on everyone’s lips at the moment instead of focus on winning an election.
-
8 October 2020, 17:46 #4Senior Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2014
- Posts
- 534
- Downloads
- 0
- Uploads
- 0
-
11 October 2020, 05:20 #5
-
11 October 2020, 09:04 #6
-
12 October 2020, 14:05 #7
-
8 October 2020, 19:56 #8
Apparently Q responded with several conversations between then and now (in an attempt to work out the details in a non public environment) however apparently those talks broke down with the ATF refusing to respond to their requests. As a result in order to limit liability of their customers they went public with it.