Results 16 to 24 of 24
Thread: eotech opinions?
-
20 August 2010, 18:04 #16
I have a 517, 577, and and EXPS2 (OPMOD). I prefer the Eotech reticle lower third co-witness, so the 7mm riser base works fine for me, I prefer it for the less-critical cheek weld. The OPMOD has the QD mount and I've found it to be well designed and solid with an excellent repeatable zero. I run the 577 on a beater rifle with a 3X FTS magnifier. That thing has been abused horribly but has been utterly reliable.
-
20 August 2010, 18:52 #17
Check out this thread to see if it will help with the co-witness/lower 1/3 decision: http://www.weaponevolution.com/forum...ING-CO-WITNESS
Then I'd look into the EOTech XPS or EXPS series.
-
20 August 2010, 19:50 #18
Paulo I've read your post a few times since you posted it. Lots of good info. I'm just afraid of buying an optic and having the height not be what I turn out to prefer. Which is why I posed the question that I did. In terms of the xps and exps sights they are out of my current price range.
-
21 August 2010, 06:42 #19
I understand the price issue. Definitely take advantage of the EOTech rebate and check the non NV models to save even more money.
As far as the height, do you have a fixed front sight? That might be a good way to determine what height to get.
-
21 August 2010, 06:55 #20
-
21 August 2010, 07:17 #21
Paulo I have Troy folding front and rear sights. As far as the rebate I will definitely be taking advantage of the offer. Right now i can get the 552 for $375 and the 556 for $435 which I believe are great prices.
Hmac the price you're talking about isn't too bad either.
Here is a little picture of my setup now:
-
21 August 2010, 07:54 #22
I bought that OPMOD before the rebate, but it's not part of the rebate program anyway. However, I did have a 10% discount code from Optics Planet (they give you one every time you agree to submit a purchase review) so the OPMOD cost me $445 with no sales tax charged and free shipping. In my case I was sure that I wanted/needed a 7mm riser, and because I occasionally use a 3x magnifier I needed side buttons as well. And I didn't want to pay extra for NV capability, which I have no use for. This was the cheapest way for me to get the maximum number of features I needed/wanted in a high-quality optical sight.
-
21 August 2010, 08:12 #23
I don't need NV and I don't plan on using a magnifier. My biggest fear/concern is buying a raised sight and not liking it. Like I said before I believe I can raise the 552 if needed and at $375 I think that's the ticket for me..... Hopefully LOL
-
21 August 2010, 09:49 #24
Distinguished Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
- Posts
- 1,563
- Downloads
- 11
- Uploads
- 4
Coming in a bit late here, and not sure if this was covered yet, but another factor to consider when running an EOTech besides co-witness, is choice of iron sights.
As Paulo pointed out in his tutorial linked above:
When I purchased my EOTech, I initially ran a fixed FSB, with a CCH BUS. This provided an absolute co-witness which for me personally, was too cluttered of a FOV. No matter how hard I tried, I just could not get used to this set-up.If you have/use the front and rear flip-up BUIS, I recommend that you just determine what height is best for you based on your head position. If you have a fixed front BUIS/Sight, you have to first determine the proper height based on your head position, and then, if you determine that you would be better off with the absolute/regular co-witness height, then you have to]determine if you can put up with the front sight being in the way.
Using the process of elimination in an attempt to clear up the FOV, my first change was to replace the CCH BUS with a MATECH BUS. This swap to a folding BUS helped, but was still not to my liking.
My options at this point were:
- Swap the FSB for a folding front BUS.
- Purchase a riser to place the EOTech at the lower 1/3rd co-witness height.
Not wanting to spend more time dwelling over options, I sold the EOTech, purchased an Aimpoint with PRI mount, and never looked back.
(Photos of these set-ups can be seen in Paulo's tutorial.)


Reply With Quote

