Results 1 to 3 of 3
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    1,081
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Federal Judge rules in favor of Innovator Arms

    http://www.courthousenews.com/2014/03/20/66348.htm

    On Aug. 2, 2012, Innovator Enterprises Inc. asked the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms & Explosives to provide a classification letter for their new Stabilizer Brake.

    A "classification letter" from the ATF is what determines if the item is covered under the NFA and must be taxed and managed accordingly.

    ATF decided that the device was a silencer. Innovator then sued the agency in the federal court in Washington, D.C., seeking to overturn the agency's determination.

    ATF decided based on a subset of 6 characteristics that are allegedly common to 'known silencers' instead of actually testing the device in the real world.

    "Even if this general approach of relying 'solely' on physical characteristics were sound, the agency did not perform a scientific or rigorous comparison of physical characteristics," the ruling states.

    Federal Judge Bates remanded the matter back to the ATF for further review. He also granted Innovator summary judgment on its claim under the Administrative Procedure Act, holding that the agency's action must be set aside as arbitrary and capricious because of the agency's failure to "articulate a satisfactory explanation" and "examine the relevant data" in classifying Innovator's Stabilizer Brake as a "firearm silencer."

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Battle Cock Tactical
    Posts
    1,092
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Interesting. ATI recalled their GSG 522SD's a few years back because the ATF changed their mind about their barrel shroud. I believe that decision was based on that same subset of characteristics and had nothing to do with its function. I wonder if this ruling will change their operating procedure.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    1,081
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    The unfortunate part about this ruling is that Innovator still can't yet sell their device. They have to sit and wait until the ATF sends them another classification letter, and I suspect it will say mostly the same thing. I'm glad to see someone is standing up against the ATF in this but I don't have much hope that ATF will change their procedures.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •