Results 76 to 90 of 102
-
13 January 2009, 16:22 #76Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2009
- Location
- PA
- Posts
- 39
- Downloads
- 0
- Uploads
- 0
-
13 January 2009, 22:45 #77
Obviously, there is much at stake here, but I believe it is worth making the observation that IF we get something other than the MR223 which is already available in other markets, we will be the only ones to see such a rifle. In every other country in which the MR223 has been released, it is the same product, which is to say, a fundamentally different thing than the 416 we've been expecting.
I've no idea what Wilcox is building, of course, and only time will tell; that said, the naming convention alone gives me pause, as HK doesn't appear to be making any attempt to distinguish the domestic US model from the one that the rest of the planet is getting. Pricing remains a relevant concern, but if we're given the current MR223 formula with its non-standard upper/lower configuration, a lot of the enthusiasm for this product will tank in a hurry. One would think that HK would already be on top of this, but their history would seem to support wild conjecture at this point. I've no immediate need for this carbine, but my hope is that they get it right.
AC
-
13 January 2009, 23:02 #78
Hear, hear.
Given the manner in which we've managed our military weapons procurement programs over the past 100 years, I'm not sure that they haven't already needlessly missed an opportunity. I'm as hopeful as the next guy, but to stake everything on military trials which could well result in "validation of concept," but no contract or production decision -- well, that just strikes me as a bit short-sighted. We've done these trials before, and lest we forget, it wasn't so long ago that HK was virtually assured a contract for the triumphant (and now forgotten) XM8.
Now, I'll be the first to concede that a positive outcome in the trials will make my argument look rather foolish, but like the others who have already weighed in here, I was paying close attention when Magpul indicated that they were mindful of the timelines, and eager to get this into the hands of the shooting public. It would appear that they've been trumped in this, and production realities being what they are, I don't fault them for the current situation; even so, an opportunity is being wasted.
AC
-
14 January 2009, 08:09 #79Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2007
- Posts
- 5
- Downloads
- 0
- Uploads
- 0
-
14 January 2009, 08:14 #80Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2009
- Posts
- 10
- Downloads
- 0
- Uploads
- 0
Heckler & Koch Inc. Newington, NH USA
The serial numbers start with US-XXX-XXXXXX
They went up on HK's website today.
http://hk-usa.com/rifles_mr556_general.html
http://hk-usa.com/rifles_mr762_general.html
-
14 January 2009, 08:21 #81Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2009
- Posts
- 10
- Downloads
- 0
- Uploads
- 0
The official press release;
HK to make new rifles in U.S. facility
Columbus, Georgia, January 15, 2009 - Firearms maker Heckler & Koch announced today that it will manufacture two new rifle designs in a newly opened US factory in 2009. The new rifles, the MR556 and MR762, are inspired and influenced by the HK416 and HK417, two highly acclaimed models designed and produced by Heckler & Koch’s Oberndorf, Germany plant.
The rifles will be produced at a new HK manufacturing facility in Newington, New Hampshire. The facility is co-located within an existing 70,000 square foot facility. HK began manufacturing pistols in the U.S. facility in late 2008.
"We’ve reached a major milestone in our objective to establish a production presence in the US," said Wayne Weber, executive vice president of the US business unit of Heckler & Koch. “The new HK45 pistol is the first HK product officially ‘Made in the USA’. It is our goal to strategically transfer production of select HK products to the U.S., with the HK45 Compact being the next product to come off the U.S. production line and shortly thereafter, the MR series rifles.
“It is our intention for all US-made HK products to equal the quality and reliability of the products made in Germany,” Weber added. “By establishing American-based manufacturing, we can compliment our German production and ensure that HK can be more competitive in the U.S., and comply with U.S. government contracts requiring US manufacturing. HK products made in the USA will be fully compliant with federal solicitations giving preference to domestically produced products. Additionally, it will provide a boost to the U.S. economy by creating more opportunities and business for many of our U.S. subcontractors and suppliers.”
The MR556 and MR762 models, caliber 5.56x45mm and 7.62x51mm rifles respectively, will be produced at the Newington facility from American and German made components. To comply with German government regulations, certain design changes were made in the rifles to make them adaptable to the American commercial sporting market.
The semi-automatic MR series rifles use an HK-proprietary gas piston operating system recognized for ultra reliability and will have German-made cold hammer forged barrels. These are some of the same key features critical to the success of the HK416 carbines used by leading US and foreign law enforcement and military customers. The HK416 is widely viewed as a leading candidate in a possible competition to replace the U.S. military’s current M4 carbine.
-
14 January 2009, 08:23 #82
-
14 January 2009, 08:32 #83
This is a gigantic failure in my eyes, and I don't see me ever owning one. The ability of the AR15 to be modular is one of its greatest assets, and purchasing an AR15 which will not yield modular capability make no sense for my own needs.
I wish them the best of luck, but intentionally making it fail to work with existing platforms has started it off on rocky ground, and has hamstrung it from the start.
-
14 January 2009, 08:39 #84
OUTLAW-ONE,
We will have a few SHOT related threads going. The idea is to have one gigantic thread with all pictures from SHOT, and AR15 specific threads as well. Last year we limited images that we put up, this year we want to put up MUCH more.
The Staff idea for 2009 is to increase the amount of threads on the board, and get more involvement in a few areas.
-
14 January 2009, 09:47 #85Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2009
- Posts
- 10
- Downloads
- 0
- Uploads
- 0
To comply with German government regulations, certain design changes were made in the rifles to make them adaptable to the American commercial sporting market.
I can understand how people will feel this way. But, having to comply with German law is just fact. It's the only way this rifle gets made. This gun will have a 3500.00 MSRP. People will buy it because they want an HK rifle. If someone wants a Cold Hammer Forged Barrel Piston Upper they should get a LWRCi. I have one and I love it. The bulk of the cost of a piston gun is the upper. The US market demand right now (90% of it) is for complete 16 inch rifle. How many times have we read lately that company ABC is not selling lowers because they have so many orders for complete guns.
just my 2 cents
It's not like this is an SL8. Most all other AR parts will fit it.
-
14 January 2009, 09:57 #86
I honestly believe we're being given a half-truth there. If this rifle is to be made in America (or largely made in America), then the German production and export requirements are largely moot.
HK can justify the bait and switch however they like, but I am persuaded that, had they wanted to give us a semiautomatic 416, they could have done just that. This strikes me as more of a production efficiency measure with the convenient side benefit (from their perspective) that HK components will now only fit on HK lower receivers.
Oberland Arms AR pattern rifles aren't compatible with ours either, but that is because they are being made for the German domestic market. To further suggest that German-made components destined for the US market cannot conform to standard specifications because of German law is misleading at best: OA has done this for many years with impunity.
ACLast edited by Army Chief; 14 January 2009 at 10:07.
-
14 January 2009, 10:17 #87Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2009
- Posts
- 10
- Downloads
- 0
- Uploads
- 0
Army Chief, can't say I disagree. economy of scale without a doubt figure into this.
-
14 January 2009, 10:53 #88
So, according to HK, the upper can't be used on the standard AR lower. Does it even take standard AR mags?
-
14 January 2009, 11:28 #89Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2009
- Location
- PA
- Posts
- 39
- Downloads
- 0
- Uploads
- 0
-
14 January 2009, 12:37 #90
PMAGs were an issue with the 416 before; I'm curious if things will have improved any in tihs version.
AC